Jump to content
Note to existing users - password reset is required Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Appletonandy

Is Wikipedia reliable? New signing on 1 July?

Recommended Posts

OK, no harm in asking!

Looks like he may end up in the Premier League though:-

http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/16415/8653638/Montpellier-full-back-Henri-Bedimo-is-reportedly-set-to-leave-the-French-side

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There''s been a few of these in the last couple days. This is the third i''ve seen. Can''t recall who they were (really random names!) but someone is definitely bored!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, i could go on and change it to say he''s actually joining Harrogate Town for a bag of sweets and a back massage.

Still though, i''d love it to be true, he''s a title winner in France, a quality operator at left back or left wing and he''d bring me back to my all conquering days on Fifa 12 with Cameroon with him marauding down the left!

As said in the posts above, Bassong should have a word! I wonder if Eto''o has grown tired of Rissia yet?...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wikipedia is more reliable than the Encyclopaedia Britannica - FACT.  I hate it when people trot out the old ''it''s about as reliable as...(insert something funny here) because it''s simply not true.  Obviously things like this are annoying, but they usually get rectified very quickly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The thing about wikipedia is that it''s as reliable as it''s users make it. Yes there are idiots that go on it purely to vandalise it, but a large number of articles have a group of users who have adopted them. A group of users that resent the idiots.

Take a look at the following page which I have tried to keep up to date

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012%E2%80%9313_Norwich_City_F.C._season

It''s not perfect and is in need of someone to add some more prose but it is useful. (If anyone on here wants to help make this seasons article any better I''d be grateful.)

going back to that particular article it looks like someone (an idiot) has decided to add a bit of unsourced material (which I have now removed) because they wanted to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×