Terrier 0 Posted March 21, 2013 Can we keep him please Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nexus_Canary 1,013 Posted March 21, 2013 Doesnt look to be in our plans.But then if you read these boards, you could probably have half our starting XI !! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Terrier 0 Posted March 21, 2013 [quote user="Nexus_Canary"]Doesnt look to be in our plans.But then if you read these boards, you could probably have half our starting XI !![/quote]We will have Pilks back too Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BroadstairsR 2,093 Posted March 21, 2013 Do you still have any of the money from selling Rhodes? About £1.5m should do it. I would actually prefer us to persevere with this player a bit longer, but he might not wish it and a bit of money in the right direction would appease me as we have probably been buggered around enough by the whole situation involving him to be honest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pete_norw 0 Posted March 21, 2013 [quote user="BroadstairsR"]Do you still have any of the money from selling Rhodes? About £1.5m should do it. I would actually prefer us to persevere with this player a bit longer, but he might not wish it and a bit of money in the right direction would appease me as we have probably been buggered around enough by the whole situation involving him to be honest. [/quote]Think we should at least ask £4mil, after all he''s a premier lg player Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joanna Grey 0 Posted March 21, 2013 I love this story;http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11709/8576114/Huddersfield-undecided-whether-to-sign-on-loan-Norwich-striker-James-VaughanNo mention of us at all. I think there''s a small matter of a fee to be decided first. That''s providing we want to sell of course. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rolf Harris 30 Posted March 21, 2013 [quote user="Terrier"][quote user="Nexus_Canary"]Doesnt look to be in our plans.But then if you read these boards, you could probably have half our starting XI !![/quote]We will have Pilks back too[/quote]Doubt you could afford him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Redders Right Foot 22 Posted March 21, 2013 keep him. we payed a reported 2m for him, he''s injured far too much for the premier league.has already said he would rather stay at hudds.1.5m sounds fair to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Indy 3,232 Posted March 22, 2013 He''s done a good job, 9 goals in 25 games, if he could stay clear of injuries I bet he would push 20 + goals in that league. Would be very handy to get 1.5 million for him, but just to get him off the wages would also be good, along with Ward, Martin and Ayala. If the RVW signing is confirmed and we could free wages to compete to sign Weimann that would be a great start to the summer and with KK, Bechio and Holt, Jackson could be shipped out too. Good luck to Vaughan though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mungo Bumpkin 0 Posted March 22, 2013 Huddersfield have been lucky though - he hasn''t been struck down by a debilitating twisted sock or similar. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Norwich or die tryin! 0 Posted March 22, 2013 Very good player at that level and i think he''s unsettled here and wants to move further up north.Would be a good move and would suit both party''s if we could get a mil and a half. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites