RvWs 4 year contract 0 Posted January 26, 2013 Why has nobody mentioned that yet? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AJ 1,218 Posted January 26, 2013 Because it''s irrelevant - we''ve got ourselves to worry about right now! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gingerpele 0 Posted January 26, 2013 But its funny to laugh at QPR. They fail at life. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wings of a Sparrow 1,410 Posted January 27, 2013 Agreed it should make us feel a little bit better.4-0 down at one point having splashed out all those millions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mister Chops 7 Posted January 27, 2013 Queens Park Rangers 01 Green 03 Traore 05 Ferdinand 20 Fabio 21 Ben-Haim 07 Park Ji-sung (Zamora - 67'' ) 14 Granero 32 Faurlin 12 Mackie 37 Bothroyd 39 CampbellThat is a lot of transfer fees and wages in order to go 4-0 down at home to a League One side.Norwich City 13 Rudd 02 R Martin 18 Garrido 20 Barnett 24 R Bennett 08 Howson 11 Surman (Hoolahan - 72'' ) 15 Fox 17 E Bennett (Pilkington - 73'' ) 10 Jackson 37 Kane (Holt - 46'' ) To be fair, our XI on the pitch at the whistle is less like the starting XI we''ll see against Spurs:Bunn, Bassong, Turner, Tettey, Johnson, Snodgrass, Whittaker all to come in.No Kane, Jackson, Fox, Surman, R Bennett, Barnett or Rudd. To be fair, Rudd didn''t do much wrong and might be worth considering instead of Bunn. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aggy 752 Posted January 27, 2013 I don''t think either team will be/should be overly proud of their results yesterday. Why would we be mentioning QPR though? "You were just as embarrassing as us." That''s made me feel loads better than... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aggy 752 Posted January 27, 2013 "loads better thEn" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
