Fiery Zac 1,065 Posted December 27, 2012 I really hate it when people start threads that''s a rumour from someone down the pub or ''my contact at the club''......but this is exactly that (and I haven''t started one before - so be nice).Have heard we''re in for Cudicini on a 3 month loan deal. (apologies if mentioned elsewhere) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Herman 9,585 Posted December 27, 2012 Good keeper. It is a rumour i wouldn''t be too unhappy with,if it is true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gingerpele 0 Posted December 27, 2012 Would make sense, Hughton unlike Lambert doesn''t ant to rely on inexperienced (and looking more and more likely likes he''s never going to get any unless we sell him) Rudd, and if Ruddy isn''t going to be back until end of March a loan GK would make sense, Cudicini is 4th choice at Surs, although I''d expect Gomez (if he''s actually still there?) to try and force a move for himself, as he won''t even be second choice for a couple years. Carlo hasn''t had much game time at Spurs and could be a bit rusty, can''t really remember how he''s done in his most recent appearances, And nowadays may be no better than Rudd, but Hughton knows best. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baldyboy 0 Posted December 27, 2012 so whos going back Kane or Garrido, as only 2 loan players allowed in Prem Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gingerpele 0 Posted December 27, 2012 Garrido doesn''t count. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Year of the tiger 51 Posted December 27, 2012 Garrido doesn''t count but you''re only aloud one loan from any pl club so couldn''t have both kane and cudicinni Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Year of the tiger 51 Posted December 27, 2012 That should be allowed not aloud ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZLF 261 Posted December 27, 2012 interesting - that would suggest there is not much confidence in Bunn to be honest. If thats what Hughton thinks then Cudicini is a good option. Not sure we can sign for a 3 month loan in the prem - i have a notion that it can only be until the end of the season - but with Ruddys injury taking longer to heal than expected (perhaps suggesting it may be longer than end of March / beginning of April) it would probably be a sensible move. We only have one loan player (Kane - Garrido from Italy counts as a 1 season short term contract so not counted as a loan) so we can bring one more in - my preference would have been a striker though - or return Kane to sender if a better option comes up. With Kane not making the bench behind Jackson I am not sure we can rate him too highly Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AJ 1,218 Posted December 27, 2012 I think he would be a fantastic signing, however, I am under the impression he''s probably on pretty hefty wages Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yellow Wal 314 Posted December 27, 2012 Again, no thanks.Cudicini has been nothing more than a back up keeper since 2006. He has played 20 matches for Tottenham since 2009 and has not been able to displace any one of the three keepers in front of him.He is not better than John Ruddy and would probably cost a fortune in wages which would not be worthwhile paying for a backup. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lappinitup 629 Posted December 27, 2012 [quote user="ZippersLeftFoot"]interesting - that would suggest there is not much confidence in Bunn to be honest. If thats what Hughton thinks then Cudicini is a good option.[/quote]Why would hughton have signed Bunn if he didn''t have condidence in him Zippo? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZLF 261 Posted December 27, 2012 it depends why CH is concsidering bringing him in - if its cover for Declan then it seems ultra cautious but still understandable (if expensive) if its to play each game then that would suggest he is not happy with Bunns form and is looking for cover. Just a hypothesis - nothing else. Personally I would stick with Bunn & Rudd as I think they are more than capable enough Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SI 0 Posted December 27, 2012 My hairdresser told me after the Chelsea game, that he heard that Ruddy was Arsenal bound for a fee of around£10 Million. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZLF 261 Posted December 27, 2012 not sure I can see Ruddy leaving while still injured? maybe during the summer? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
steve b 0 Posted December 27, 2012 I just have a hunch Ruddy will be on his way to Manchester United in January, Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SI 0 Posted December 27, 2012 Of course he needs to be fit again. But nevertheless a tremendous opportunity for him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ivan Easter 0 Posted December 27, 2012 Send Kane back, get Cudicini on loan and buy a good striker. That would help Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wings of a Sparrow 1,385 Posted December 27, 2012 I''ve missed you SI! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Twitchy 0 Posted December 27, 2012 [quote user="Wings of a Sparrow"]I''ve missed you SI![/quote]I think most of us really miss SI. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
star_manic 0 Posted December 27, 2012 liars, you miss his avatar. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
N city till I die 0 Posted December 28, 2012 [quote user="ZippersLeftFoot"]interesting - that would suggest there is not much confidence in Bunn to be honest. If thats what Hughton thinks then Cudicini is a good option. Not sure we can sign for a 3 month loan in the prem - i have a notion that it can only be until the end of the season - but with Ruddys injury taking longer to heal than expected (perhaps suggesting it may be longer than end of March / beginning of April) it would probably be a sensible move. We only have one loan player (Kane - Garrido from Italy counts as a 1 season short term contract so not counted as a loan) so we can bring one more in - my preference would have been a striker though - or return Kane to sender if a better option comes up. With Kane not making the bench behind Jackson I am not sure we can rate him too highly[/quote]Kane has just come back from injury, and was on bench last game or gsame before so we can Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
York Canary 28 Posted December 28, 2012 According to the ever-reliable footballrumours&BS website we''re in for Pantilimon from Citeh on loan as well..bloody hell Share this post Link to post Share on other sites