ZLF 261 Posted September 29, 2012 thumbelina I can also see a 3-5-2 working for us at some stage in the future, wigan are showing it can work but PL tried and failed with it with the personnel he had at his disposal last season. I am still not convinced we have the right players for that formation, eg right wing back, is Elliott good enough defensively or Martin good enough going forward? Both are better for me than whittaker.If playing that today - and we wont - we could go Ruddy Barnett Bassong BennettEBennett Tettey Garrido Pilkington Snodgrass Hoolahan Morison Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kellybrook 0 Posted September 29, 2012 Garrido CB? Wow, glad you aren''t in charge. Your site must be full of insightful stuff with opinions like that.[quote user="Huckerbys Boots - Matt"]RuddyE.Bennet Barnett R.Martin GarridoHowson JohnsonSnodgrass Butterfield HoolahanHolt Lot of changes here which I doubt Hughton would do, the defence needs to be altered tho, I don''t wanna see Suarez up against Barnett/Turner. Maybe Martin RB and Garrido CB with Tierney coming in.Can Garrido play CB???[/quote] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kellybrook 0 Posted September 29, 2012 What have you lost heart in FFS? You seem to be saying we can''t win unless we have two up front. If so, then most of the division won''t win today. [quote user="norfolkbroadslim"]I was all excited thinking about the team vs Liverpool, but I now feel very disheartened after today''s revelations. I think it is highly likely that Hughton is going to definitely start with only 1 up front. Now that we''re down to 3 strikers plus Martin I think Hughton doesn''t think he can start with 2.[:(] I know this is supposed to be my team, but I''ve lost heart. I think Tettey and Hoolahan will start ion a 5 man midfield with Hoolahan playing behind Holt. Prediction: Norwich 0 - 1 Liverpool (Gerrard Pen, 69) [:(][/quote] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kellybrook 0 Posted September 29, 2012 How would playing wing backs be going for it?In this thread so far there has been people saying we can''t win unless there is two up front, someone ( a clown I suspect) saying Tettey should start his first game on the wing when he is a defensive central midfielder and now wing-backs.I think we may have the whole "get it forward" brigade in one thread....[quote user="Thumbelina"]and now for something slightly different. Ruddy R. Martin Barnett R. BennettE.Bennett Garrido Tettey Butterfield Hoolahan Jackson HoltThe above assumes that Bassong will not be fit, otherwise he would come in for Barnett. Pilkington, Snodgrass/Surman, Tierney, Turner, Morison, Bunn and Fox.It''s only the Scousers at home so let''s go for it![/quote] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Matt Morriss 69 Posted September 29, 2012 r="kellybrook"]Garrido CB? Wow, glad you aren''t in charge. Your site must be full of insightful stuff with opinions like that.F*** off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gingerpele 0 Posted September 29, 2012 Do you own the Huckerbys boots site Matt? If you don''t, then who ever does can''t be too happy with you using the websites name in your username on other forums when abusing other posters... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thumbelina 0 Posted September 29, 2012 [quote user="kellybrook"]How would playing wing backs be going for it?[/quote]Coming from somebody who believes playing wing backs can''t be attacking, but playing a 4-5-1 can be attacking, I''ll take that as a compliment.Thank you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Highland Canary 76 Posted September 29, 2012 Interesting quite how different the formations suggested on this thread were to the one chosen. We might still have lost but it might have been more fun. Where was our midfield btw? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thumbelina 0 Posted September 29, 2012 [quote user="Highland Canary"]Interesting quite how different the formations suggested on this thread were to the one chosen. We might still have lost but it might have been more fun. Where was our midfield btw?[/quote]Indeed, Share this post Link to post Share on other sites