Viva Marc Libbra 0 Posted August 24, 2012 According to SSN. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanaryNath 30 Posted August 24, 2012 So who''s tracking Rhodes'' movements then?!!!#findjordanrhodes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
York Canary 28 Posted August 24, 2012 [quote user="CanaryNath"]So who''s tracking Rhodes'' movements then?!!!#findjordanrhodes[/quote]WTF NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wizard 0 Posted August 24, 2012 Bugger! not too happy about this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
super canary 0 Posted August 24, 2012 DONT WANT RHODES DONT WANT RHODES DONT WANT RHODES DONT WANT RHODES DONT WANT RHODES DONT WANT RHODES DONT WANT RHODES DONT WANT RHODES DONT WANT RHODES DONT WANT RHODES DONT WANT RHODES DONT WANT RHODES DONT WANT RHODES DONT WANT RHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODDDDEEESSS!!!! Keyboard strop. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vazzza 62 Posted August 24, 2012 You can''t miss what we''ve never had...He could have been great for us, but its a wage we don''t need if he''s going to play 3 games a year! Keep him on a "Pay as you play" contract or get rid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Morisons Prozac 0 Posted August 24, 2012 Please don''t jump down Hughton''s throat, there have been reports suggesting he''s unsettled in Norwich. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baldyboy 0 Posted August 24, 2012 why not happy Wiz? hes a crock!!! for someone who has been playing football for just over 10 years to only have clocked up just over a 100 appearances says it all!!! He played 6 times last season after joining us!!! He should never have been signed, possibly Lamberts worst signing IMO!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shefcanary 2,385 Posted August 24, 2012 The Nando''s in Norwich ain''t up to his expectations!!! Seriously though if he goes, leaves only Cinnamon tomorrow to provide pace in a 4-4-2 unless we go with a 4-3-3 and a front three of Pilks / Holt or Morison / Bennett. If the latter it could be a long afternoon if the wide boys drop too deep! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
super canary 0 Posted August 24, 2012 [quote user="shefcanary"]The Nando''s in Norwich ain''t up to his expectations!!!  Seriously though if he goes, leaves only Cinnamon tomorrow to provide pace in a 4-4-2 unless we go with a 4-3-3 and a front three of Pilks / Holt or Morison / Bennett. If the latter it could be a long afternoon if the wide boys drop too deep![/quote]Benno is out injured, wont feature tomorrow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CambridgeCanary 0 Posted August 24, 2012 [quote user="super canary"][quote user="shefcanary"]The Nando''s in Norwich ain''t up to his expectations!!!  Seriously though if he goes, leaves only Cinnamon tomorrow to provide pace in a 4-4-2 unless we go with a 4-3-3 and a front three of Pilks / Holt or Morison / Bennett. If the latter it could be a long afternoon if the wide boys drop too deep![/quote]Benno is out injured, wont feature tomorrow.[/quote]Also, we have signed Snodgrass. Perhaps you hadn''t heard? ;-) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ROBFLECK 132 Posted August 24, 2012 HE HAS NEVER HAD A FAIR CHANCE AT CR, WHY DO YOU WANT TO SELL HIM THEN? TO GET RHODES???? GOD NO! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phillip J Fry 0 Posted August 24, 2012 [quote user="super canary"][quote user="shefcanary"]The Nando''s in Norwich ain''t up to his expectations!!! Seriously though if he goes, leaves only Cinnamon tomorrow to provide pace in a 4-4-2 unless we go with a 4-3-3 and a front three of Pilks / Holt or Morison / Bennett. If the latter it could be a long afternoon if the wide boys drop too deep![/quote]Benno is out injured, wont feature tomorrow.[/quote]He is an injury doubt, as far as I know, he could still feature. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary1902 0 Posted August 24, 2012 You only have to look at the bloody-mouthed picture of vaughan on every website to see how much of an impact he''s had here.As if getting bashed in the mouth was the highlight of his Norwich spell Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Brownstone 0 Posted August 24, 2012 Did they say whether this is a loan or a permanent move? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wizard 0 Posted August 24, 2012 [quote user="baldyboy"]why not happy Wiz? hes a crock!!! for someone who has been playing football for just over 10 years to only have clocked up just over a 100 appearances says it all!!! He played 6 times last season after joining us!!! He should never have been signed, possibly Lamberts worst signing IMO!!![/quote] I don''t know BB, I just really like James, yes, I now there''s better out there, but I just like the lad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
super canary 0 Posted August 24, 2012 [quote user="CambridgeCanary"][quote user="super canary"][quote user="shefcanary"]The Nando''s in Norwich ain''t up to his expectations!!!  Seriously though if he goes, leaves only Cinnamon tomorrow to provide pace in a 4-4-2 unless we go with a 4-3-3 and a front three of Pilks / Holt or Morison / Bennett. If the latter it could be a long afternoon if the wide boys drop too deep![/quote]Benno is out injured, wont feature tomorrow.[/quote]Also, we have signed Snodgrass. Perhaps you hadn''t heard? ;-)[/quote]I think the point being made was going with some pace on the flanks, something snodders does not possess in abundance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phillip J Fry 0 Posted August 24, 2012 [quote user="ROBFLECK"]HE HAS NEVER HAD A FAIR CHANCE AT CR, WHY DO YOU WANT TO SELL HIM THEN? TO GET RHODES???? GOD NO![/quote]He hasn''t had a fair chance because he''s always injured. He''s been at Norwich over a year and has made 5 appearances, saying someone hasn''t had a fair chance when 90% of the time they''re not available for selection is ridiculous.Also you Capslock is broken. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
unique 434 Posted August 24, 2012 I posted at the time of Vaughan''s signing that it would be a waste of money as he is an accident just waiting to happen. I was pilloried by many posters who got more than excited at the prospect of a player signing for Norwich, who gained some distorted reputation on the back of such a paucity of matches completed. It is a lesson to be learnt for all signings, imho. The hype often turns out to be far greater than the substance. A lesson learnt from the ridiculous enthusiasm that greeted the signing of Le Brellier, and even, dare I say it, the signing of Muzinic, who never really matched the expectations all those many years ago. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wizard 0 Posted August 24, 2012 Some natives thoughts: http://www.downatthemac.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=72001 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
York Canary 28 Posted August 24, 2012 I really had high hopes for him this season as did many others and the goals he got in pre-season looked like a sign of things to come..Simeon is great for effort and running, but Vaughan would have done that and had compure enough to actually score or put others through. I really, REALLY hope we are getting some quality to replace him as he have ONE pacey striker now and Holt, Morison and Chris Martin. 3 strikers is not enough for any club. I guess we''ll have Loza on the bench on Saturday?!?! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JKUIL 0 Posted August 24, 2012 [quote user="baldyboy"]why not happy Wiz? hes a crock!!! for someone who has been playing football for just over 10 years to only have clocked up just over a 100 appearances says it all!!! He played 6 times last season after joining us!!! He should never have been signed, possibly Lamberts worst signing IMO!!![/quote]Fully agree with this. I thought this was a ridiculous signing at the time. God knows what Lambert was thinking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phillip J Fry 0 Posted August 24, 2012 [quote user="York Canary"]I really had high hopes for him this season as did many others and the goals he got in pre-season looked like a sign of things to come..Simeon is great for effort and running, but Vaughan would have done that and had compure enough to actually score or put others through. I really, REALLY hope we are getting some quality to replace him as he have ONE pacey striker now and Holt, Morison and Chris Martin. 3 strikers is not enough for any club. I guess we''ll have Loza on the bench on Saturday?!?![/quote]After all, the transfer window is shut, and we''re stuck with what we''ve got until January? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Viva Marc Libbra 0 Posted August 24, 2012 Doesn''t say if loan or permanent but the rumours are that it will be a season long loan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrdi 373 Posted August 24, 2012 [quote user="York Canary"]3 strikers is not enough for any club.[/quote]You say that, but it''s probably plenty when you only play one up top. :/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bethnal Yellow and Green 1,557 Posted August 24, 2012 Vaughan was always a calculated risk - he had just come off the back of a 30 game season so it looked as if the injury worries were finally starting to subside. For the money we paid for him it could have been a real bargain - but alas it was not to be. I truely hope that he can over come his problems and start to get some regular games (and Norwich have a sell on clause) - I however suspect that due to the constant string of injuries the lengendary pace he once had is long gone. Good luck James Vaughan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canarypops 0 Posted August 24, 2012 Sky Sports understands Norwich forward James Vaughan is undergoing a medical at Huddersfield ahead of a loan move to the John Smith''s Stadium.Vaughan''s future at Carrow Road has been the subject of speculation all summer with a number of clubs credited with an interest in his services.The likes of Birmingham, Derby and Celtic have all been linked with Vaughan with the 24-year-old finding himself down the pecking order at Norwich.Vaughan only joined the Canaries last summer from Everton, but he was restricted to just five Premier League appearances after suffering a serious knee injury last September.The former England Under 21 international is now back to full fitness and has impressed for Norwich in pre-season.Norwich boss Chris Hughton is happy to loan out Vaughan so that he can get valuable first-team action under his belt.Huddersfield chief Simon Grayson has been looking to bolster his attacking options and he has lined up a deal to bring Vaughan in on a season-long loan.If true i wonder what suprise we will get new signing Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Delias Love Child 0 Posted August 24, 2012 Why post news that is already on here? What a waste of space Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crispy 4 Posted August 24, 2012 Maybe so we can discuss the subject ?!.....Well I would be slightly annoyed if he goes away on a season long loan. Feel like I have never even seen enough of him to decide if he should stay & we currently need goals, bring him on against QPR ?Unless we have a pacey striker poised to sign then it''s no real gain for us, Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Norma Stick 0 Posted August 24, 2012 [quote user="ncfctilidie1080"]Why post news that is already on here? What a waste of space[/quote]Woo, woo, pull over. It''s the forum police. Why feel the need to add to the "waste of space" by a pointless post Share this post Link to post Share on other sites