Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
militantcanary

Lawrenson you ***

Recommended Posts

Just pathetic from the great pundit, ignored a blatant obstruction in the most dismissive terms and then didn''t even enter into a conversation re Holt going to the Euros, even jug ears looked surprised.

Oh that''s right, we were going to be in League 2 by now Nostradamus of the football world

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yep Lawrenson is a tw@t! I would like to know why Holt isn''t good enough for an England place? Come on Lawrenson tell us why the second highest English goal scorer is not good enough?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lawrenson seems to have hit a nerve with this.  Currently trending on Twitter and not with complimentary comments either, seems he is out of touch with many!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He wasn''t asked whether Holt is good enough to go to the Euros, nor if he thought Holt SHOULD go. He was asked if he thought there was any chance that Holt will go, to which he stated no.

I''d agree with him, Holt won''t be picked to go to the Euros.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Realistically there is no striker who is playing better that will play in the first Euro game thats English.

Holt>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.Carroll, Welbeck, Sturridge, Crouch, DefoeLawrenson can choke on his own member.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Coruchy is a better player than Grant Holt apparently.  Ah well - but the fact they had to mention Holty again suggests to me that they are a bit rattled today.  Keep it up guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote user="Aggy"]He wasn''t asked whether Holt is good enough to go to the Euros, nor if he thought Holt SHOULD go. He was asked if he thought there was any chance that Holt will go, to which he stated no.

I''d agree with him, Holt won''t be picked to go to the Euros.[/quote]SPOT ONunfortunately, as on here, so many will read a few words then make up the restpersonally I don''t think Holt will go either

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lawrenson is an idiot.... Like the ref today he''s only interested in stroking the egos of the big players clubs and managers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lawrenson hates Norwich because he always used to have bad games against us in the ''80s. I think he even scored an own goal for us!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He seemed insulted by the mere suggestion. Just hope that Holt is sufficiently motivated to bag a hattrick against his beloved Liver- ´we shoulda had at least 3 pens´ pool.

Anyway, who cares what that cretin thinks. It''s Harry who''ll decide (probably) and a blinder from GH on Monday won''t hurt his chances.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What on earth in that show suggests to anyone he hates Norwich? He said that there have been some moans about MOTD from Norwich fans, but then said they do praise Norwich and will continue to do so if we keep performing like we did today (ie; we played well). Linker throughout said how well both us and Everton had done this season.

The obstruction issue was dismissed because if we''re being frank, it shouldn''t have ben an issue. It didn''t lead directly to the goal - the ball shoots out of Pienar''s legs and goes back towards the Everton goal not towards ours; the ball falls loose, not directly into the path of an Everton player; we have two or three opportunities to deal with it. They can''t dissect every incident that takes place in massive detail. If I was doing the analysis I would have said nothing more than "maybe it should have been a freekick, but to be honest, Norwich should have dealt with the threat before it led to a goal", which isn''t a million miles away from what was said I don''t think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sadly this type of behaviour was something we always derided our not too bright neighbours fo,r yet here we have all manner of over excited keyboard warriors claiming some kind of almighty sleight against the ''mighty'' City.I think a few on here need to get their head out of the own backsides and stop giving it all the bertie big bollox stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should Holt be called for England ? Laurwinson was quite emphatic NO. And then apparently Crouch is a better player.

England are shite so he''s probably right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="xymox"]Should Holt be called for England ? Laurwinson was quite emphatic NO. And then apparently Crouch is a better player.

England are shite so he''s probably right.[/quote]Wrong !He was asked will .... not should

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Didn''t take long for you to take the thread down to your level of intelligence, did it ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
City 1st,

You are entitled to your opinion as I and everyone else on here is. The only keyboard warrior on here at the moment is you....

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How the question was worded or not, Lawrenson was just damn right rude and disrespectful to the current second highest English scorer.

Respect in football has long gone..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you would like to have some level of intelligent discussion then please feel free to begin that. From what I have seen you have no idea how to do that. Should or will what''s the difference FFS. If you want a fight lets take it offline as no one on here cares about yours or mine opinion. Send me your number and I''ll call you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"You are entitled to your opinion as I and everyone else on here is"how kind of you"The only keyboard warrior on here at the moment is you"yep, it is me making the threats and using foul language - well spotted

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

City 1st

Calm down. Remember we''re all City fans. Look at your tone....

Not related to Lawronare you? ( only a joke... Don''t worry)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
eh ?I would hardly say having a gentle dig at the pompous is any cause for excitement..................if you percieve it as anything but, then maybe you need to get out a bit more

(and maybe take the key out of your back a bit more as well)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="xymox"]If you would like to have some level of intelligent discussion then please feel free to begin that. From what I have seen you have no idea how to do that. Should or will what''s the difference FFS. If you want a fight lets take it offline as no one on here cares about yours or mine opinion. Send me your number and I''ll call you.[/quote]The irony of you asking for an '' intelligent discussion'' when you appear to not have a clue of the difference between ''will'' and ''should'' will not be lost on others.I am not sure how we can have a fight over the phone but I am happy to give you a number to call

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It''s a debate that rolls on, until such a time when the BBC decide to change the pundits, and to some degree the format this will always be an outdated biaised programme. All three of them tonight are so far up their own arses i''m suprised they are able to talk about anything but themselves!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...