Favourite loan player for city

[the pigman 0]

Hate to think how many loan players we have had over the years so to lighten the mood on here a little who has been your best one and worst.My best was Scot Parker a few years back and worst to many to name.

[Move Klose 303]

troy archibald henville great roeder signing !

[mrs miggins 0]

hucks or omozusi ?...not too sure

[BroadstairsR 2,273]

Kyle Naughton.

 

 Well you did ask.

[AJ 1,377]

Kyle Naughton has had a phenomenal season, most prominent loan signing since Hux.

[Howson is now! 1]

Crouch. Wish we''d have been able to afford him and Hucks. I think it''s safe to say we made the right choice with only being able to buy one but would have loved both.

[im spartacus canary 0]

the best ched evans    ... the worst omar koroma

[Scooby 0]

Hucks will always, i think, be the best loan signing we''ve made but recently I enjoyed watching Dani P. Would love to see him back.

[spencer 1970 215]

Hux until we signed him, bar that Crouch was awesome for us as was Scotty P.

Worst? Simon Tracey.

[jermy118 0]

The only thing i remember Koroma doing was missing a one on one chance against Colchester

Koroma hasnt played for another club since his release from Pompey in 2009

[Boyo 0]

Apart from Huckerby, Lansbury was my favourite.  Worst?  Where do we begin!

[Mister Chops 11]

Best was Ched Evans, but that''s only because I wasn''t around when Huckerby was a loan player.Worst loan player was Steve Walsh, my god he was sh*t with an attitude to match.

[I am a Banana 0]

Lansbury for me, followed by Pacheco. They were just the extra quality that we needed to get promoted this year!

[Peregrine Shorts 554]

Steve Walsh wasn''t on loan, he was ours

[William Darby 0]

Forster wasn''t too shabby.  Crouch was good while he was here.

[Faded Jaded Semi Plastic SOB 1,234]

Hucks, Scott Parker, Lansbury, Dani Pacheco, Peter Crouch and David Bentley

[Canariesworld 0]

Martin Taylor at the time was a great loan signing. Worst is a tough one because there are so many but I''d go for that James Henry kid from Reading reserves.

OTBC

[Mister Chops 11]

[quote user="Peregrine Shorts"]Steve Walsh wasn''t on loan, he was ours[/quote]Blimey, he didn''t last long.Tony Cottee was gash.  James Henry was rubbish.  That Spanish right back who played about 1.5 games was dreadful - Juan Velasco?  David Carney was crap.

[Budapest Canary 155]

Leroy Lita did a good job for City - worst: John Hartson

[Cappsy 0]

Dani Pacheco/Chris Killen

[nutty nigel 7,963]

Bobby Bell [:S][:''(]

 

 

[N.C.F.Chapman 0]

Gotta be Hucks!!!Second would be David Nielsen who  seemed to go downhill once we had actually signed him

[star_manic 0]

[quote user="Canariesworld"]Martin Taylor at the time was a great loan signing. Worst is a tough one because there are so many but I''d go for that James Henry kid from Reading reserves.

OTBC[/quote].....is that the same henry that was sent off for wolves a few weeks ago? best- hux,lansbury,danni,scotty,naughts, so many to choose, all gave something extra and probably too little between them to honestly pick. worst-i won''t even begin on this one, several roeder disasters could top the list.[:D]

[kick it off 2,062]

No - that''s Karl Henry - James Henry now plays for Millwall. Best Huckerby by a country mile, although I liked Lansbury, and M. Taylor too. Worst - Antoine Sibierski.

[Son Ova Gunn 165]

Inside footballing circles Bentley was considered abit of a coup for Norwich as he was expected to go out to an established premier club that season but never quite lived up to the billing. Hucks must surely win for the effect he had on the team during his time as a loanee.

For worst, Sibierski is a really good call, purely due to the difference between expectation and result.