Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Cappsy

Potential/possible positive Sunday

Recommended Posts

the game is on sky which means there will be more in-depth coverage/analysis of any big calls the referee makes. so if we are hard done by (AGAIN) with any decisions then at least we have some top pundits noticing this and hopefully fighting our cause. just a thought. although i hope the referee Mark Halsey has a good game as i certainly rate him as one of the better referees... well done to the man on his fight against disease also

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Apart from Barnett, we havnt been ''hard done by''. Both the Wiagn and Chelsea incidents should have been penalties!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Apart from Barnett" ??????

Ruddy, cleary brought Ramieres down, had Ramieries had got round him he had a open net, if that isnt a ''clear goal scoring opportunity'' then what is?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Funny that CDM. Most pundits did not see it your way. Penalty(s) given that were most certainly not clear cut compounded with sending offs which were at the very least debatable.

Still why let a reasonable assessment spoil a feeling of superiority eh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Take off the Yellow tinted spectacles.

Regardless of whether Ramieres was already going down, or whether Di Santo went down early, both Ruddy and De Leat made contact.

Only a Norwich fan would think they wernt penalites!

Had both them challenges been on Holt, would you have been crying for a penalty.............of course you would!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="CDMullins"]"Apart from Barnett" ??????

Ruddy, cleary brought Ramieres down, had Ramieries had got round him he had a open net, if that isnt a ''clear goal scoring opportunity'' then what is?[/quote]

No he wouldn''t have, Pilkington was in the six yard box:(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
who said i claimed they weren''t fouls? bee more specific CDMullins. I''m talking about the red cards. Pilkington was on the line, ramires was going well wide, not just wide; and he''s not known for his lethal finishing so he still would of had a task to score. Ruddy could even of recovered and got back into position as pilkington closed down the over hit ball from ramires. not yellow and green glasses at all. that may seem an unlikely scenario but its not impossible, even if he is brazilian

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah right, so we judge whether it is a goal scoring opportunity by how lethal the fouled player is at finishing?

Haha, dont make me laugh Pilkington was on the line.

May seem an unlikly scenario? Lets just leave it at that,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
[quote user="CDMullins"]You mean like Mark ''Norwich are doomed'' Lawrenson?[/quote]As opposed to CD "Hoolahan isn''t good enough for the Championship Mullins"? Still, at least Lawrenson has the excuse that he was winding up a member of the production team off-air. What''s yours?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Chelsea penalty was clearly a penalty.  I still maintain if it had been Holt fouled by the Chelsea keeper, it would have been a yellow card but meh.  Anyway, it was the kind of penalty that is described as "stonewall" for some reason, even though stonewall means "to block or delay".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing we can do about past games & ref''s decisions.

WBA have only scored 2 league goals this season, both by Long, who may not be playing on Sunday!

That''s positive for you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are some people STILL moaning about previous refereeing decisions? There''s nothing we can do, the refs gave the decisions, Ruddy will miss West Brom (rightly or wrongly), move on! Jump back into the now, we have two points on the board, look to future games and lets hope we can grab some much needed points, rather than dwelling on the past (and bloody referees). Nuff said. OTBC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree with your point but my post is about the next game. the fact that IF there is a huge debateable refereeing decision against us this sunday then it will be highlighted more on sky live than match of the day with (not live) commentary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...