ollio 0 Posted June 21, 2011 10 points for spotting the error in this article http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/13845821.stm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lennon7 0 Posted June 21, 2011 Shackell joined Barnsley from Norwich in the summer of 2010 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barclay hero 0 Posted June 21, 2011 No he didnt (assuming you were trying to state fact and not be ironic) He was on loan to us from Wolves at the end of the previous season. Barnsley bought him after we went down Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Matt Morriss 69 Posted June 21, 2011 [quote user="Barclay hero"]No he didnt (assuming you were trying to state fact and not be ironic) He was on loan to us from Wolves at the end of the previous season. Barnsley bought him after we went down[/quote]Haha well done! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ollio 0 Posted June 21, 2011 2003–2008 Norwich City 119 (3)2008–2010 Wolverhampton Wanderers 12 (0)2008–2009 → Norwich City (loan) 14 (0)2009–2010 → Doncaster Rovers (loan) 21 (1)2010– Barnsley 44 (3He only came to us for the 2008-9 Season. So was transferred between Wolves & Barnsley in 2010.. Me 1 - 0 BBC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bethnal Yellow and Green 1,557 Posted June 21, 2011 A classic example of a sports writer being undermined by a caption writer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ncfc26 0 Posted June 21, 2011 I assume it has been changed because that isnt what it says now Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lennon7 0 Posted June 21, 2011 [quote user="Barclay hero"]No he didnt (assuming you were trying to state fact and not be ironic) He was on loan to us from Wolves at the end of the previous season. Barnsley bought him after we went down[/quote]I copied and pasted the ''error'' that was below the picture. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nu_matik 167 Posted June 21, 2011 Anyone else notice that on the Norwich cty page on bbc sport (premier league page :)), that they have paul mcveigh as number 18?! at least this was the case yesterday... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites