BlyBlyBabes 0 Posted May 25, 2011 Paul Lambert would love to get in Klose for his goals, experience and knowledge of ''the German way''.Peter Cullum is convinced that this could be the key initiative in strategizing for Premiership success rather than struggle.City cannot fund this Klose project.Cullum agrees to fund a 2-year contract for Klose. He is to be refunded by City if we are still in the Premiership after 2 years.Question: would our Board agree to fund Lambert''s Klose project or turn it down?Riddle me this, riddle me that.OTBC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlyBlyBabes 0 Posted May 25, 2011 Or alternatively would they agree to Cullum funding the Klose Project??Hmmm.OTBC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lappinitup 629 Posted May 25, 2011 [IMG]http://i1102.photobucket.com/albums/g445/lappinitup/BlyBlyBabes.jpg[/IMG] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jim Smith 2,314 Posted May 25, 2011 Whilst this goes against all my normal instincts if Klose is, as is reputed, on £120,000 a week and we would have to pay anything approaching this then I would not be overly keen on bringing him in due to the complete disparity between his wages and those of the other players. I guess maybe we could pay him a big signing on fee and a lesser wage but I am just not sure he''s worth it when we can pick up decent younger strikers for a fraction of the overall cost.In answer to your question gues it depends on whether relations between Cullum and the board have thawed somewhat since previous events. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wazzock 902 Posted May 25, 2011 [IMG]http://i52.tinypic.com/1zbginr.jpg[/IMG] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlyBlyBabes 0 Posted May 25, 2011 [quote user="Jim Smith"]Whilst this goes against all my normal instincts if Klose is, as is reputed, on £120,000 a week and we would have to pay anything approaching this then I would not be overly keen on bringing him in due to the complete disparity between his wages and those of the other players. I guess maybe we could pay him a big signing on fee and a lesser wage but I am just not sure he''s worth it when we can pick up decent younger strikers for a fraction of the overall cost. In answer to your question gues it depends on whether relations between Cullum and the board have thawed somewhat since previous events.[/quote] Well, for one thing the composition of the NCFC borad has changed somewhat since ''previous events''. OTBC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man 3,776 Posted May 25, 2011 Do we really want Klose? He is 33 in a fortnight, on stupid wages, past his prime, and he has never been prolific at club level anyway. Does he even speak English? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 4,718 Posted May 25, 2011 [quote user="BlyBlyBabes"]Paul Lambert would love to get in Klose for his goals, experience and knowledge of ''the German way''. Peter Cullum is convinced that this could be the key initiative in strategizing for Premiership success rather than struggle. City cannot fund this Klose project. Cullum agrees to fund a 2-year contract for Klose. He is to be refunded by City if we are still in the Premiership after 2 years. Question: would our Board agree to fund Lambert''s Klose project or turn it down? Riddle me this, riddle me that. OTBC[/quote]Bly is flying in the happy skies again today.I must hand it to him managing to start a thread with both Cullum and Klose in the same sentence.Who would have thought that possible?[:|] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lappinitup 629 Posted May 25, 2011 [quote user="First Wazzock"][IMG]http://i52.tinypic.com/1zbginr.jpg[/IMG] [/quote]Excellent stuff Wazzy BUT....... Shouldn''t there only be ONE person in the picture? [;)] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlyBlyBabes 0 Posted May 25, 2011 [quote user="Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man"]Do we really want Klose? He is 33 in a fortnight, on stupid wages, past his prime, and he has never been prolific at club level anyway. Does he even speak English?[/quote] Well, if Lambert really wants him......................... OTBC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man 3,776 Posted May 25, 2011 [quote user="BlyBlyBabes"][quote user="Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man"]Do we really want Klose? He is 33 in a fortnight, on stupid wages, past his prime, and he has never been prolific at club level anyway. Does he even speak English?[/quote] Well, if Lambert really wants him......................... OTBC[/quote]OK then, let me replace the words ''Do we'' with ''Would Lambert''... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
I am a Banana 0 Posted May 25, 2011 I''d rather mikey owen! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
norfolkchance1 0 Posted May 25, 2011 In the award for Starting A Hypothetical Nonsense With No Substance Thread at the Pinkun Messageboard Awards Night Bly wins hands down with this one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yobocop 1,094 Posted May 25, 2011 Mikey Owen?! DId you really just call him that :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ruddygore 0 Posted May 25, 2011 He prefers it to what all his team-mates call him, Sicknote. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lambert is King 0 Posted May 25, 2011 Why not simply listen to the type of player Paul Lambert says he is going to sign for your answer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wazzock 902 Posted May 25, 2011 [quote user="lappinitup"][quote user="First Wazzock"][IMG]http://i52.tinypic.com/1zbginr.jpg[/IMG] [/quote]Excellent stuff Wazzy BUT....... Shouldn''t there only be ONE person in the picture? [;)][/quote][IMG]http://i51.tinypic.com/9ubymd.jpg[/IMG] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
