priceyrice 123 Posted March 14, 2011 Jackson starting tonight, lets hope for a goal for him to get him a bit of confidence, an in form jackson would be like a new player for us. I think 3 0 tonight- Fox, Holt, Jackson Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mister Chops 7 Posted March 14, 2011 Maybe they''ve identified a lack of pace in the BC back line, otherwise this surprises me a little. But glad we''ve gone back to 2 up front rather than the 4-5-1 (or 4-4-1-1).What''s the full line up? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ncfcfan 0 Posted March 14, 2011 He scored 2 against them last time, so it could be a good move. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jed exodous 0 Posted March 14, 2011 No Wilbraham due to a back injury apparently...Norwich01 Ruddy02 R Martin06 Whitbread22 Ward32 Tierney07 Crofts11 Surman14 Hoolahan15 Fox09 Holt10 JacksonSubstitutes13 Rudd, 03 Drury, 05 Edwards, 12 Lansbury, 18 Smith, 19 Lappin, 24 McNamee Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted March 14, 2011 Time to pull your finger out Simeon! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mister Chops 7 Posted March 14, 2011 Not much width there unless the full backs bomb forwards. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jed exodous 0 Posted March 14, 2011 Full backs will provide the width, as they have done virtually all season, and last... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
priceyrice 123 Posted March 14, 2011 Fox and Surman i would hope, that will do! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mister Chops 7 Posted March 14, 2011 [quote user="jed exodous"]Full backs will provide the width, as they have done virtually all season, and last...[/quote]Which is marvellous if we dictate the play but you know how it goes sometimes, it''s nice to have some genuine midfield width. Still, looks like we have a Plan B on the bench. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rock bus 836 Posted March 14, 2011 No striker on the bench just shows where we are shortOnly MacNamee on bench to allow any real change in attack Lets hope nothing happens to Holt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nuff Said 4,938 Posted March 14, 2011 [quote user="rock bus"]No striker on the bench just shows where we are shortOnly MacNamee on bench to allow any real change in attack Lets hope nothing happens to Holt [/quote]Lansbury??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jed exodous 0 Posted March 14, 2011 Jackos making some good runs, giving 100%, but just lacks the final quality. Shame... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mister Chops 7 Posted March 14, 2011 [quote user="jed exodous"]Jackos making some good runs, giving 100%, but just lacks the final quality. Shame...[/quote]Yes, When he took that high ball down with one lovely touch I thought "here we go", and then his shot went out for a throw in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rock bus 836 Posted March 14, 2011 Apart from "the miss" I think he has done well -some nice touches and works by being a very different player to Holt -Bristol defenders have to deal with both types of threat Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Branston Pickle 3,598 Posted March 14, 2011 Would be great all round if Jacko were able to score, he has pace to spare and worries defenders when he has the ball, just that extra bit of confidence could do wonders - and with Wilbers having scored last week he will also be confident when he comes back in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nuff Said 4,938 Posted March 14, 2011 I like the idea of swapping between him and Wilbraham - the opposition won''t know what to expect. It would be great if he could score as well as Wheeliebin. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paul moy 235 Posted March 14, 2011 Good runs but simply cannot finish which could be costly tonight. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Somerset Canary 0 Posted March 14, 2011 Judging by tonights performance, it has come to my attention that he only has right foot. Despite his critics, he has done exceedingly well to get where he has without a left foot. Haha Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paul moy 235 Posted March 14, 2011 [quote user="Somerset Canary"]Judging by tonights performance, it has come to my attention that he only has right foot. Despite his critics, he has done exceedingly well to get where he has without a left foot. Haha[/quote]Indeed, and he was swapped for somebody that has a left, right and head, coupled with pace.[:(] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jed exodous 0 Posted March 14, 2011 Nearly made it 20 posts on this thread without the comparisons starting... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paul moy 235 Posted March 14, 2011 [quote user="jed exodous"]Nearly made it 20 posts on this thread without the comparisons starting...[/quote]unfortunately our old failings now mean we are 1-1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jules 0 Posted March 14, 2011 Jackson''s in the right places but can''t finish. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paul moy 235 Posted March 14, 2011 [quote user="Jules"]Jackson''s in the right places but can''t finish. [/quote]It is a mistake to play him on the left as he has no left foot. All of his goals have come from him playing on the right as far as I can recall. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SWP = Poor Mans Ruel Fox!! 0 Posted March 14, 2011 [quote user="paul moy"][quote user="jed exodous"]Nearly made it 20 posts on this thread without the comparisons starting...[/quote]unfortunately our old failings now mean we are 1-1[/quote] 3-1 is so much better :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Branston Pickle 3,598 Posted March 14, 2011 Paul Moy wrote "unfortunately our old failings now mean we are 1-1"Yup, but our fantastic new found ability to keep going meant we won 3-1!!!! I''ll settle for that every time, even if it will eventually bring on a massive coronary! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SWP = Poor Mans Ruel Fox!! 0 Posted March 14, 2011 Must say though Jackson did not show a lot tonight, great result though!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nuff Said 4,938 Posted March 14, 2011 Â rock bus wrote:No striker on the bench just shows where we are shortOnly MacNamee on bench to allow any real change in attackLets hope nothing happens to Holt Lansbury???No further questions your honour. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paul moy 235 Posted March 14, 2011 [quote user="Branston Pickle"]Paul Moy wrote "unfortunately our old failings now mean we are 1-1" Yup, but our fantastic new found ability to keep going meant we won 3-1!!!! I''ll settle for that every time, even if it will eventually bring on a massive coronary![/quote]Well, I was pretty nervous throughout that game. We never do it the easy way !!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Statto28 0 Posted March 14, 2011 For a guy who hasnt featured really at all for a good period, didn''t think he did too bad at all. Looked lively, gave the Bristol defence something different to think about. Yes, he missed a couple but he was in the right area and you got to be in the right place to miss. Think it was also very telling that on him coming off, Lambert gave him a really warm greeting. Top man management i thought and it wouldnt surprise me to see Jackson pop up with a couple of crucial goals before the end of the season! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary Poirot 1 Posted March 14, 2011 Not convincing from Jackson. His biggest asset is his pace, the rest of his game is, in my opinion, not quite up to upper Championship level. But without any other fit strikers at the moment, it''ll be cruical for Lambert to keep Jackson''s confidence up, despite him being out of his depth quality wise. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites