walks on water 0 Posted February 27, 2011 4,1,2,1,2 4,2,3,1 4,3,2,1 4,3,3 4,4,1,1 How did it look like we were orgsanised? ...and did it look like something that could be effective when we''re at home, when teams sit back? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary_on_the Trent 0 Posted February 27, 2011 4-4-1-1 it looked to me with Hoolahan off Holt, Surman & Lansbury wide. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
York Canary 28 Posted February 27, 2011 [quote user="Canary_on_the Trent"]4-4-1-1 it looked to me with Hoolahan off Holt, Surman & Lansbury wide.[/quote]Beautiful lineup Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yellow Rider 0 Posted February 27, 2011 [quote user="walks on water"]4,1,2,1,2 4,2,3,1 4,3,2,1 4,3,3 4,4,1,1 How did it look like we were orgsanised? ...and did it look like something that could be effective when we''re at home, when teams sit back?[/quote]i was not happy when i saw the formation but it did work fine first half when we played some very good stuff. Certainly would''nt use it at home as the lack of width and pace was arguably even more apparent. Surman maybe an elegant footballer but wimps out of far too many tackles and has no pace. Most oponents at FCR know our pattern very well and set up with two very well organised banks of four.With our narrow gameset and no pace in the side that''s why we''ve struggled so much at home and have only been rescued by a succession of last minute goals. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites