Loopzilla 1 Posted September 14, 2010 [quote user="morty"]Anyway, as lovely as this is, it isn''t getting my ironing done.[:)][/quote]Damn! Just as I was beginning to enjoy myselves.Personally, I like to get my housework done in time for Loose Women... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
morty 0 Posted September 14, 2010 [quote user="Loopzilla"][quote user="morty"]Anyway, as lovely as this is, it isn''t getting my ironing done.[:)][/quote]Damn! Just as I was beginning to enjoy myselves.Personally, I like to get my housework done in time for Loose Women...[/quote]I''m actually a big fan of loose women.Not the telly show mind.[:)] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Loopzilla 1 Posted September 14, 2010 [quote user="morty"][quote user="Loopzilla"][quote user="morty"]Anyway, as lovely as this is, it isn''t getting my ironing done.[:)][/quote]Damn! Just as I was beginning to enjoy myselves.Personally, I like to get my housework done in time for Loose Women...[/quote]I''m actually a big fan of loose women.Not the telly show mind.[:)][/quote]Loose/tight, all depends upon the lubrication.With my sincerest apologies to the OP. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZLF 271 Posted September 14, 2010 The ref got it right. If possible a player should get to the sidelines for treatment so play can continue. Clearly Shacks could. The issue as always in inconsistency by the refs on how its intepretted. Put simply some refs enforce it, some dont and most take various approaches in between those two extremes during any given 90 mins.. Perhaps the only way to stop it is move the time keeping to the 4th official who automoatically stops the clock and allow as long as is needed for each treatment before starting it again, that way there is no time wasting benefit to be gained and no one man advantage either. I suspect the number treatments will drop but it will mean more games will finish after 5 for a 3 o''clock kick off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Icecream Snow 761 Posted September 14, 2010 To be honest, I think Mark Robins was watching a different game. From Robins'' logic the reason a Barnsley player put the ball into his own net, was because another Barnsley player wasn''t on the pitch. Obvious really :-PIn the referee''s defence, there must have been 6-7 incidents where Barnsley players were curled up in the fetal position, and several occasions where they mysteriously recovered completely unaided :-P Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
