zak123 0 Posted August 24, 2010 For me its a tough question. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Minster Canary 0 Posted August 24, 2010 Considering between the two they have represented Norwich four times competetively (all Ruddy) it is in fact a very stupid question. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gingerpele 0 Posted August 24, 2010 Why is it a tough question?We never played Gilks, he came here as cover, was not needed, we got rid of him.... simple Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
morty 0 Posted August 24, 2010 For me its a very odd question. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zak123 0 Posted August 24, 2010 How is it a stupid question? The guy who Norwich had but then sold, and is now playing in the Premiership vs the guy who we have got now.... Seems quite valid! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
morty 0 Posted August 24, 2010 Well for a start, I see this as a thinly veiled dig at Ruddy.But seeing as we never saw Gilks here, no one really has much to base their answer on.Yes Gilks is technically now a Premiership, but I would bet you my testicles that this time next year he''ll be a championship one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
I am a Banana 0 Posted August 24, 2010 Ruddy, he ccan save pealties [y] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanaryJames 0 Posted August 24, 2010 I''d rather have Gilks than Marshall, and did when both were here.We got Hoolahan for Gilks though, so can''t complain. I''d have preferred us to sell Marshall, use Gilks, and spend the money on bringing others players (like Hoolahan) in though... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
