pennywise 0 Posted August 7, 2010 according to the suns championship preview we did ..yeah yeah i know its the sun, murdoch rag, bla bla bla, but even so £1.2 million [:O] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrs miggins 0 Posted August 7, 2010 we dont have 1.2 million to spend on 1 player, it would have been around 700k, (in my opinion) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mister Chops 7 Posted August 7, 2010 Heard it was 500k.Probably bollocks, but hey. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pennywise 0 Posted August 7, 2010 i only read the sun for deidries photo casebook..that magical world where gorgeous women always wear matching underwear and jump into bed with another woman at the drop of a hat [:S] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Walking Man 13 Posted August 7, 2010 In a word, No. Lazy journalism that''s all, Wolves paid Saints that so the Sun seems to think that''s what we must have paid. The Independant reckons it was 500k... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boogle 0 Posted August 7, 2010 £500,000 rising to £600,000.Remember dave Striker, was rumoured we paid 750,000-1m for him. later found out it wasnt even a quarter of that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
James Kent 0 Posted August 7, 2010 SKY also reported it as 1.2 million ahead of the game last night. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bjg123 0 Posted August 7, 2010 I was under the impression they turned down £1m from another champ club? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man 3,703 Posted August 8, 2010 We''ll never know for sure; it is anyone''s guess.So, while we''re at it: I doubt we got much change from a million. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chelmsford Canary 0 Posted August 8, 2010 I''d be very shocked!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thecanaryfan 0 Posted August 8, 2010 [quote user="Boogle"]£500,000 rising to £600,000.Remember dave Striker, was rumoured we paid 750,000-1m for him. later found out it wasnt even a quarter of that.[/quote]Wasnt he in X-men? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nicholls 0 Posted August 8, 2010 Yea Yea, Wolves turned down a 1 million pound offer from Shefield United, So we must of paid the same or slightly more Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Slob 0 Posted August 8, 2010 In one of the papers a while back it said it was 500k Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dhickl 0 Posted August 8, 2010 £1.2m was reported soon after the transfer by local papers. They claimed it included add-on and sell on clause, so I can imagine it being in the region of £500k, but increasing depending on appearances & promotion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Block E Buh 0 Posted August 8, 2010 Wolves still owed us £500,000 for Shackell, so we paid £600,000 for Surman so look at it how you want to. Though reading the Sun isnt exactly a very reliable source, its a comic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
I am a Banana 0 Posted August 8, 2010 600k will rise to 850k if we get promoted and he makes 50 apps! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sideshow Tim 110 Posted August 8, 2010 I thought you were on holiday nana? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shiplee15 0 Posted August 8, 2010 Heard it was 500k but tbh anything below 1mill for me is an absolute bargain for him. I think he''s a hell of a player. Though he wasnt good friday i''ll admit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites