SUPER YELLOW CANARY 0 Posted June 27, 2010 I was speaking to a friend on thursday who has been involved in the club and sponsers many games etc. We got on the discussion on gary doherty and that the reason he didnt get a new contract is because he wanted his wage to be £10,000 and basically norwich said no and now we have no doherty. also Gary house has been up for sale since the start of this year so perhaps this was just waiting to happen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
I am a Banana 0 Posted June 27, 2010 99.9% of people dont care anymore. He is no longer a norwich player and we all know he left due to wage issues! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUPER YELLOW CANARY 0 Posted June 27, 2010 it applies to the 0.01% that do care then Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
I am a Banana 0 Posted June 27, 2010 that 0.01% is you! so it never needed posting Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUPER YELLOW CANARY 0 Posted June 27, 2010 Are you actually moaning at me for a pointless post? Hypocritical Much. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThorpeCanary 71 Posted June 27, 2010 If this is true thanks for posting, I wanted Doherty to stay after last seasons performance but 10k a week for him is not on, and im not surprised we''ve let him go. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUPER YELLOW CANARY 0 Posted June 27, 2010 i am in banana famous words "9.99%" its true [:D] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUPER YELLOW CANARY 0 Posted June 27, 2010 Cmon pinkun Add A Edit Button!99.9% Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
William Darby 0 Posted June 27, 2010 [quote user="IbleedYellowGreen"]Cmon pinkun Add A Edit Button!99.9% [/quote]Doc will buy you one from his 10k per week. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yobocop 1,444 Posted June 28, 2010 WOuldn''t be too surprised to see him end up at mk dons actually Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thirdlion 0 Posted June 28, 2010 And this thread is another reason why pictures in signatures need banning. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wizard 0 Posted June 28, 2010 [quote user="thirdlion"]And this thread is another reason why pictures in signatures need banning.[/quote]Banning, of any kind is so playground. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nuff Said 5,963 Posted June 28, 2010 Using the phrase "so playground" is so playground..... ooops [:$] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wizard 0 Posted June 28, 2010 Are carrots that dear nowadays?[img]http://www.acidtrax.net/smileys/getmecoat.gif[/img] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Jedi 0 Posted June 28, 2010 "Banning, of any kind is so playground."Instead of "banning" - how about "removal of feature" or even "restricting the size via one line of CSS that should take 5 seconds to knock out"...? :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites