Muddy funster 0 Posted June 8, 2010 I really think Surman may be worth a look at least. Was outstanding at Southampton. What do we reckon??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Willmeister 35 Posted June 8, 2010 Would love Surman, think he is a quality player, and would do a job good replacing Rusty if he left. The only thing is the money he may cost. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
I am a Banana 0 Posted June 8, 2010 is surman a RB?! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Willmeister 35 Posted June 8, 2010 Yes, a RB to replace Rusty. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
I am a Banana 0 Posted June 8, 2010 im sure he used to play RB at leicester! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lincs CR 0 Posted June 8, 2010 Leicester? Surman hasn''t played for Leicester... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
city-till-i-die 7 Posted June 8, 2010 [quote user="I am a Banana"]im sure he used to play RB at leicester![/quote]What u smokin Nanna??? [;)] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
King Klose 0 Posted June 8, 2010 [quote user="I am a Banana"]is surman a RB?![/quote]Used to play for Southampton, very highly rated. Plays CM/LM, so could do the left of the diamond role IF we were to keep a similar system. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Willmeister 35 Posted June 8, 2010 [quote user="I am a Banana"]im sure he used to play RB at leicester![/quote][IMG]http://ironicsurrealism.blogivists.com/files/2009/10/homer-simpson-doh.gif[/IMG] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CDMullins 436 Posted June 8, 2010 id take them both, far too rich for us though im afraid Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanaryOne 0 Posted June 8, 2010 [quote user="CDMullins"]id take them both, far too rich for us though im afraid[/quote]But we have finacial backing according to most on here ,how else could we have brought in those 4 new players Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Adam NCFC 0 Posted June 8, 2010 I''ve mentioned Keogh before. He seems to have just disappeared! Quality player [:)] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
city-till-i-die 7 Posted June 8, 2010 Surley they still owe us money from the Shack transfer [;)][;)][;)]I would take both players as rest of the payment Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paul ncfc 0 Posted June 8, 2010 We probably lost anything owing to us with the loan deal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
I am a Banana 0 Posted June 8, 2010 [quote user="Ncfc"][quote user="CDMullins"]id take them both, far too rich for us though im afraid[/quote]But we have finacial backing according to most on here ,how else could we have brought in those 4 new players [/quote]the lambert facot.r Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Muddy funster 0 Posted June 8, 2010 I''m not saying we''re going to you understand, but I would wager we could afford one of those. I''ll bagsy Surman. What a coup that would be! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lambo 0 Posted June 8, 2010 I think we have more of a need for Keogh. Surman would be a cheeky bonus though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
