Brendo 0 Posted April 10, 2010 Haven''t seen much on here yet, but Chris Martin didn''t seem to foul the keeper in my opinion in his jump to score the disallowed header. What do you guys think? I can see why it was disallowed, but not sure if it should have been.What was your view of it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gingerpele 0 Posted April 10, 2010 The keeper fell over...... so refs always give a foul....from how i saw it, the keeper jumped on Martin, who had his back to him, but because the keeper went down, he got the free-kick.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harry 0 Posted April 10, 2010 Martin didn''t foul the keeper or score the goal, the cross went straight in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex11ncfc 0 Posted April 10, 2010 One of those which is easy for the ref really. Martin didn''t stop looking at the keeper for a second once the ball came in and the ref knew that, hence giving the foul. I haven''t seen it again yet but Martin made it easy for the ref Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brendo 0 Posted April 10, 2010 [quote user="Gingerpele"]The keeper fell over...... so refs always give a foul....from how i saw it, the keeper jumped on Martin, who had his back to him, but because the keeper went down, he got the free-kick....[/quote]My thoughts exactly GP. [:S] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gingerpele 0 Posted April 10, 2010 [quote user="Alex11ncfc"]One of those which is easy for the ref really. Martin didn''t stop looking at the keeper for a second once the ball came in and the ref knew that, hence giving the foul. I haven''t seen it again yet but Martin made it easy for the ref[/quote]really? i thought Martin had he back turned, if thats the case, then of course its going to be a foul, as even looking at the keeper is a foul these days.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LinkNR9 0 Posted April 10, 2010 It was another contraversial decision from an inept referee. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
West Ham Canary 0 Posted April 10, 2010 The ref seemed to take the view that Martin handled the ball, hence the yellow card Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex11ncfc 0 Posted April 10, 2010 [quote user="Gingerpele"][quote user="Alex11ncfc"]One of those which is easy for the ref really. Martin didn''t stop looking at the keeper for a second once the ball came in and the ref knew that, hence giving the foul. I haven''t seen it again yet but Martin made it easy for the ref[/quote]really? i thought Martin had he back turned, if thats the case, then of course its going to be a foul, as even looking at the keeper is a foul these days....[/quote]Yeah I watched him and he gave the keeper a long look, as I said makes it very easy for the ref to give the foul Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Legend Iwan 30 Posted April 10, 2010 I was sitting right behind it and you could see Marting jumped straight into their keeper knowing that he couldn''t beat the keeper or defender to the ball. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
"""""""""Ben """"""""""" 0 Posted April 10, 2010 Everytime the keeper falls over a freekick gets given, it''s part of the game these days. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boyo 0 Posted April 10, 2010 From where I was it looked the keeper lost it in the sun and him and Martin ran into each other, but if Martin took a long look at the keeper then I can definately see why he has given it. Even if Martin didn''t look at the keeper and kept his eyes firmly on the ball then he probably would have still given the free kick. Over protected keepers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rivvo 254 Posted April 10, 2010 Martin took a good look at the keeper and then jumped into him, I couldn''t argue with it and didn''t even jump up and celebrate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Clint 221 Posted April 10, 2010 Surely the ref must have thought it was hand ball, hence the yellow? So its no debate about a foul, did he handle it? I don''t think he got anywhere near it so no for me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Suffolk exile 0 Posted April 10, 2010 Chrissy had a good look to see where the keeper was as the ball came in. No surprise that it wasn''t given though would have to see it again to be sure he actually impeded the keeper. I guess the yellow was because if he got away with it would have been a goal, but even so very harsh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary Ascent 0 Posted April 10, 2010 [quote user="Rivvo"]Martin took a good look at the keeper and then jumped into him, I couldn''t argue with it and didn''t even jump up and celebrate.[/quote]This is exactly how I saw it. Martin pushed into the keeper. Surprised by the yellow card though.Will be interested to see a few of the decisions again on the FLS tonight if we get any airtime! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mason 47 874 Posted April 10, 2010 Whose goal would it have been if it had stood, presuming that it travelled right through without a touch?Dare I say.... ''No Goals'' Lappin? Can''t remember who crossed it now, might have been Drury or Lappin.I enjoyed listening to the crowd in the build up to one of his shots- ''Shoooooooot'' went the cry, ''DON''T DO IT'' came the response. That and Doherty selling Jermaine Easter for a absolute fool on the halfway line were the most entertaining things pre-90 minutes in the game for me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary Ascent 0 Posted April 10, 2010 Russell I think?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brendo 0 Posted April 10, 2010 I swear it didn''t go in without a touch? [^o)]Because when it went over the line, I could''ve sworn it was travelling alot slower, thus meaning Chrissy got a touch? [:S] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harry 0 Posted April 10, 2010 From my view in the Snake Pit I can assure you CM never got a touch on it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Syteanric 1 Posted April 10, 2010 the keeper lost the ball in the sun, i thought if anything he collided more with his defender, Simon Lappins cross went straight in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
woody11 0 Posted April 11, 2010 i had the best view from the Barclay martin stood his ground and the keeper came over the top of him and flapped at it and missed the ball completely. was a joke Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Howson is now! 0 Posted April 11, 2010 If you had the best view Woody, how did you not see Martin blatantly look at the keeper and make no attempt to beat the defender or keeper to the ball other than by banging into the keeper? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Clint 221 Posted April 11, 2010 Russell''s put the cross in so would have been his goal but irrelevant as it didn''t count. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
woody11 0 Posted April 11, 2010 the keeper fluffed and was looking for a foul when he missed the ball, but it doesn''t matter because i knew the ref was going to blow up for a foul because any contact on the keeper refs always give a free-kick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Delia Out! 0 Posted April 11, 2010 For me it was a definate goal.But why the hell Martin was given a yellow I''ll never know [:@] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Go Wash Your Mouth Out Son 0 Posted April 11, 2010 Saw a replay. Martin did NOT touch the ball or the keeper. Should have been a goal, although keepers always get the decisions their way. [:@] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCFC_Thain 0 Posted April 11, 2010 Definite foul, Martin looked for where the keeper was and then jumped into him, going to be a foul every day of the week. Not sure what he got booked for though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lambert is King 0 Posted April 11, 2010 Anyone got a link to anywhere this is being shown at present ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites