Yellow Wal 314 Posted December 18, 2009 I have looked on here but have been unable to find anything about the fact that he should have been sent off!Surely, just before we scored our second goal he fouled Grant Holt and denied him a goal scoring opportunity.What would have happened if the ball had not broken to Chris Martin for him to score? Just because we scored it doesn''t make his foul any less serious does it?Perhaps we should blame Chris Martin for scoring! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ian 1,129 Posted December 18, 2009 [quote user="Yellow Wall"]I have looked on here but have been unable to find anything about the fact that he should have been sent off!Surely, just before we scored our second goal he fouled Grant Holt and denied him a goal scoring opportunity.What would have happened if the ball had not broken to Chris Martin for him to score? Just because we scored it doesn''t make his foul any less serious does it?Perhaps we should blame Chris Martin for scoring![/quote]Given the fact that the referee gave us next to nothing all night, clearly favoured the home side, and didn''t give anything for a punch in the face on Holt (didn''t even stop the game), I expect he would have given a goal kick or something if Martin hadn''t scored! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pete_norw 0 Posted December 18, 2009 [quote user="I.S."][quote user="Yellow Wall"]I have looked on here but have been unable to find anything about the fact that he should have been sent off! Surely, just before we scored our second goal he fouled Grant Holt and denied him a goal scoring opportunity. What would have happened if the ball had not broken to Chris Martin for him to score? Just because we scored it doesn''t make his foul any less serious does it? Perhaps we should blame Chris Martin for scoring![/quote]Given the fact that the referee gave us next to nothing all night, clearly favoured the home side, and didn''t give anything for a punch in the face on Holt (didn''t even stop the game), I expect he would have given a goal kick or something if Martin hadn''t scored![/quote]Don''t worrie folks this ref is now under review, and with any luck will be reffing blue square or lower from now on, Respect, I ask ya. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Howson is now! 0 Posted December 18, 2009 He also booked Holt twice according to match reports. Once in the first half and once in the second. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pete_norw 0 Posted December 18, 2009 [quote user="CallsignViper"]He also booked Holt twice according to match reports. Once in the first half and once in the second.[/quote]Hence the review Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ian 1,129 Posted December 18, 2009 [quote user="pete_norw"][quote user="CallsignViper"]He also booked Holt twice according to match reports. Once in the first half and once in the second.[/quote]Hence the review[/quote]Pretty sure it was the Ginger Pele booked in the first half, think a few people got it wrong initially. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pete_norw 0 Posted December 18, 2009 [quote user="I.S."][quote user="pete_norw"][quote user="CallsignViper"]He also booked Holt twice according to match reports. Once in the first half and once in the second.[/quote]Hence the review[/quote]Pretty sure it was the Ginger Pele booked in the first half, think a few people got it wrong initially.[/quote]I thought it was the Doc too, but a review was set for next week so I heared Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DOGGER 0 Posted December 18, 2009 Neil Adams was sure it was Holt booked both halfs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shaun Tilly Lace 0 Posted December 18, 2009 [quote user="pete_norw"][quote user="I.S."][quote user="Yellow Wall"]I have looked on here but have been unable to find anything about the fact that he should have been sent off! Surely, just before we scored our second goal he fouled Grant Holt and denied him a goal scoring opportunity. What would have happened if the ball had not broken to Chris Martin for him to score? Just because we scored it doesn''t make his foul any less serious does it? Perhaps we should blame Chris Martin for scoring![/quote]Given the fact that the referee gave us next to nothing all night, clearly favoured the home side, and didn''t give anything for a punch in the face on Holt (didn''t even stop the game), I expect he would have given a goal kick or something if Martin hadn''t scored![/quote]Don''t worrie folks this ref is now under review, and with any luck will be reffing blue square or lower from now on, Respect, I ask ya. [/quote]It''s too late to do us any good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCFC_Thain 0 Posted December 18, 2009 [quote user="Yellow Wall"]I have looked on here but have been unable to find anything about the fact that he should have been sent off!Surely, just before we scored our second goal he fouled Grant Holt and denied him a goal scoring opportunity.What would have happened if the ball had not broken to Chris Martin for him to score? Just because we scored it doesn''t make his foul any less serious does it?Perhaps we should blame Chris Martin for scoring![/quote]It can''t have been denying an obvious goal scoring oppurtunity as a goal was score resulting from it. Could still have been something else but due to the goal he can therefore not be sent off for DOGSO Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Liam 0 Posted December 18, 2009 So Holt was on the floor with a head injury and the ref didnt stop the game!?isnt that a serious rule? he shouldnt even be reffing sunday under 12 girls league let alone league football. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
