First Wizard 0 Posted November 26, 2009 Especially after McNally said today, in claming there''s no plans to sell Hooli, but ''fringe players'' could well be sold or released!Whilst that chokes me, if thats Lamberts wish, then I must go along with it.Sorry Jamie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paul ncfc 0 Posted November 26, 2009 As he has not been involved in the last two squads I half expected him to leave today. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CRAZY LEGS 0 Posted November 26, 2009 jaimewhaleymcveigh will all go in january, but whaley is the only one we are likley to get any money for Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jack Flash 13 Posted November 26, 2009 Maybe a deal with Col U to try to settle the matter. I recall that Lisbie will be leaving in Jan, so they need another striker. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wizard 0 Posted November 26, 2009 Same here Paul to be honest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wizard 0 Posted November 26, 2009 [quote user="Jack Flash"]Maybe a deal with Col U to try to settle the matter. I recall that Lisbie will be leaving in Jan, so they need another striker.[/quote]Good God no, not to a rival, remember what happened last time?[:S] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hucka Hucka Huckerby 0 Posted November 26, 2009 Is Lisbie off then? Did they buy him back from the filth, or is he on loan? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wizard 0 Posted November 26, 2009 [quote user="Bruces Header"]Is Lisbie off then? Did they buy him back from the filth, or is he on loan?[/quote]He''s on loan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CRAZY LEGS 0 Posted November 26, 2009 loan suprised ipswich aint called him back already Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chicken 0 Posted November 26, 2009 Maybe one of Gill and Tudur Jones as well.Come January should we expect another striker or is McNamee seen as a plausible back up? If we were to loose Jamie then we are down to three recognised pro strikers in Holt, Martin and Cody with Daley as back up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lambo 0 Posted November 26, 2009 McNally''s said only fringe players are for sale eyy??VERY good news.Good luck to Jamie if he is leaving, always gives his all and i''ve nothing but respect for him for that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mister Chops 7 Posted November 26, 2009 This has been coming for a while. Unlike the other "old lags" (Doc, Russell), Cureton started Lambert''s first 3 games in charge and didn''t impress so has been sidelined. He''s on big wages and selling him would be the right thing for the club to do. Appreciate his love for the club and all that, but it''s time he moved on to League Two or another level where he can rely on his brain and positioning sense, and where his ever decreasing pace won''t hurt him as much. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Norma Stick 0 Posted November 26, 2009 I suspect come January the wage bill will be trimmed a little, with not just barn door Jamie leaving.If I were in Lambert''s shoes, I''d be sending some of the younger fringe players out on loan, players like Francomb, Stephens, Dumic, Steer and / or Rudd.Players to be sold would be McVeigh, Daley and barn door and possibly Gill and / or Tudur-Jones if Hoolahan and Russell are kept.What do others think? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lambo 0 Posted November 26, 2009 I''d rather see stuff like that than flogging Hoolahan to the highest bidder. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
missing in action? 0 Posted November 26, 2009 bye.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Salopian 1 Posted November 26, 2009 I suspect that the club and PL will not be too upset if Curo and perhaps Theo, Whaley and MCV will all leave in January, although only Whaley would command any sort of fee.For different reasons they are all squad players and no more, for emergency use. As to Curo, he has experience but seems to have lost his zip. Sadly I think he may have to think of non-league football, where he may be able to play for a few more years. The same applies to MCV, who has the skills but has lost his pace over the past season or two. It''s all very sad, but as we have little money and big ambitions we need to carry fewer emergency squad players and more who can make a good contribution. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mello Yello 2,290 Posted November 26, 2009 [quote user="First Wizard"]Especially after McNally said today, in claming there''s no plans to sell Hooli, but ''fringe players'' could well be sold or released!Whilst that chokes me, if thats Lamberts wish, then I must go along with it.Sorry Jamie.[/quote]Damn! Doherty hasn''t got a fringe.......In fact, he hasn''t got any hair! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Norma Stick 0 Posted November 26, 2009 [quote user="Mello Yello"][quote user="First Wizard"] Especially after McNally said today, in claming there''s no plans to sell Hooli, but ''fringe players'' could well be sold or released!Whilst that chokes me, if thats Lamberts wish, then I must go along with it.Sorry Jamie.[/quote]Damn! Doherty hasn''t got a fringe.......In fact, he hasn''t got any hair![/quote]No but he''ll be here in Jan unlike barn door Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barclay Kid 0 Posted November 26, 2009 Hmmmm, Seemed Like Lambert Really Liked Cureton When He First Became Manager, Playing Him Over McDonald And Others. Now It Appears That He Has Seen Sense! [;)] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yelloow Since 72 54 Posted November 26, 2009 I have to disagree a bit. I think Curo is probably on his way out now, but I wouldn''t want to lose the cover available in the current squad. At the moment we have two players and a young player coming on at each position. If we sell OTJ and Gill, as soon as injuries occur we''re back to playing players out of position. That doesn''t equate with promotion, IMO.If McVeigh leaves, who do we play in the hole if Hoolahan gets injured (as he did for a long spell last season). There is too much at stake to try and save some fairly low wages on an economy drive. Some young players could go out on loan as long as there is a recall clause if the worst happens (as it did with the RB position already).For the first time in years, City has had a reasonable depth to deal with injuries when they happen. Do you really want Russell playing up front as a striker again? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crafty Canary 495 Posted November 26, 2009 [quote user="Jack Flash"]Maybe a deal with Col U to try to settle the matter. I recall that Lisbie will be leaving in Jan, so they need another striker.[/quote]They won''t want barn door then!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DDD In The Fine City 1 Posted November 27, 2009 At least the woman that sits reading he book while her husband watches the game in the upper Barclay will be safe from now on Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duncan Edwards 0 Posted November 27, 2009 Unless Nelson slices a clearance.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlyBlyBabes 0 Posted November 27, 2009 [quote user="Yelloow Since 72"]I have to disagree a bit. I think Curo is probably on his way out now, but I wouldn''t want to lose the cover available in the current squad. At the moment we have two players and a young player coming on at each position. If we sell OTJ and Gill, as soon as injuries occur we''re back to playing players out of position. That doesn''t equate with promotion, IMO.If McVeigh leaves, who do we play in the hole if Hoolahan gets injured (as he did for a long spell last season). There is too much at stake to try and save some fairly low wages on an economy drive. Some young players could go out on loan as long as there is a recall clause if the worst happens (as it did with the RB position already).For the first time in years, City has had a reasonable depth to deal with injuries when they happen. Do you really want Russell playing up front as a striker again?[/quote]Good post. I agree.OTBC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
king canary 7,605 Posted November 27, 2009 [quote user="Yelloow Since 72"]I have to disagree a bit. I think Curo is probably on his way out now, but I wouldn''t want to lose the cover available in the current squad. At the moment we have two players and a young player coming on at each position. If we sell OTJ and Gill, as soon as injuries occur we''re back to playing players out of position. That doesn''t equate with promotion, IMO.If McVeigh leaves, who do we play in the hole if Hoolahan gets injured (as he did for a long spell last season). There is too much at stake to try and save some fairly low wages on an economy drive. Some young players could go out on loan as long as there is a recall clause if the worst happens (as it did with the RB position already).For the first time in years, City has had a reasonable depth to deal with injuries when they happen. Do you really want Russell playing up front as a striker again?[/quote]For replacing Hoolahan in case of injuries- have we not just signed McNamee. I dont think he is a direct replacement for Wes but a better options the McVeigh who has not even made the bench in a long time. With OTJ and Gill I can see one being let go, they are behind a fairly long list of players atm, Rusty, Smith, Lappin, Adeyemi, Hughes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chicken 0 Posted November 27, 2009 [quote user="king canary"][quote user="Yelloow Since 72"]I have to disagree a bit. I think Curo is probably on his way out now, but I wouldn''t want to lose the cover available in the current squad. At the moment we have two players and a young player coming on at each position. If we sell OTJ and Gill, as soon as injuries occur we''re back to playing players out of position. That doesn''t equate with promotion, IMO.If McVeigh leaves, who do we play in the hole if Hoolahan gets injured (as he did for a long spell last season). There is too much at stake to try and save some fairly low wages on an economy drive. Some young players could go out on loan as long as there is a recall clause if the worst happens (as it did with the RB position already).For the first time in years, City has had a reasonable depth to deal with injuries when they happen. Do you really want Russell playing up front as a striker again?[/quote]For replacing Hoolahan in case of injuries- have we not just signed McNamee. I dont think he is a direct replacement for Wes but a better options the McVeigh who has not even made the bench in a long time. With OTJ and Gill I can see one being let go, they are behind a fairly long list of players atm, Rusty, Smith, Lappin, Adeyemi, Hughes.[/quote]McVeigh has made the bench - he was there against Brighton - unless we have another player of his stature and with his face . . . . . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
still holding out for new heroes 0 Posted November 27, 2009 We should look to offload all off the following:CuretonMaricWhaleyMcVeighTheoklitosGilland possibly OTJto free up wages for the two who have just arrived and another striker Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joanna Grey 0 Posted November 27, 2009 [quote user="still holding out for new heroes"]We should look to offload all off the following:CuretonMaricWhaleyMcVeighTheoklitosGilland possibly OTJto free up wages for the two who have just arrived and another striker[/quote]Maric has been told he can leave, I''m surprised he''s still here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fig Roll 0 Posted November 27, 2009 The big problem with all this easy talk on the subject of ''who we should offload'' is that a) someone else actually wants them; andb) the players themselves wish to move rather than sit on their current contract. The alternative could be to terminate their contract by mutual consent but this has a cost implication when it comes to getting new players on board. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites