Has anyone else heard this?

[Pete Raven 276]

Intriguing graphs that sadly mean nothing to me. I always thought the figues on the left were supposed to go up?

[YankeeCanary 0]

[quote user="cityangel"]

[quote user="Canaries in Bed"]I think LQ and CA should get it on or at least fight, always having little digs at each other...[/quote]

Not really, just don''t understand why she moans about this site on other sites but then comes back to have a dig at people.

I''ve never met her so it''s nothing personal and its nothing I wouldn''t say to her face to face.

[/quote]

That''s pretty ambitious of you Angel. Unless you have very, very high heels you might find yourself saying your piece to her belly button. [:D]

[nutty nigel 7,897]

[quote user="Mello Yello"][quote user="nutty nigel"]

Or an Arsenal V Newcastle match because there seems to be a love/hate relationship there too[:@][W][U]

[/quote]

Shove it up your hoop - bog brush bingo boy.....

Then see if you can wash the cuprinol stains out the ar$e of your fence-sitting shorts.....

HA''WAY THE TOON!

[/quote]

[;)]

 

[The Fish Seller 0]

[quote user="Sports Desk - Pete"]Intriguing graphs that sadly mean nothing to me. I always thought the figues on the left were supposed to go up?[/quote]The graphs show the position (as measured in visitor traffic) of the Pinkun website in the top 100,000 websites worldwide. With an average position of 82,931, the Pink ''Un is ranked 40,000 positions higher than the TWTD site ie. has considerably more traffic. The summer silly season sees the traffic rise to a peak comfortably inside the top 50,000 sites worldwide so all those Ameobi rumours weren''t such a waste of 0''s and 1''s after all though I doubt you actually use these figures to strengthen your advertsising position. Of course if you take into consideration that there are 82,930 porn sites in the world this actually proves the Pink Un to be the most popular site out there closely followed by Google and the Ebay/Paypal complaints page. FWIW the average position of the line does go up from left to right over the last three years.

[blahblahblah 2]

[quote]The graphs show the position (as measured in visitor traffic) of the Pinkun website in the top 100,000 websites worldwide.[/quote]But only among users of the Alexa toolbar.  Is this a representative sample ?  Who can tell ?

[Joanna Grey 0]

[quote user="YankeeCanary"]

[quote user="Buckethead"][img]http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/violet-elizabeth-bott.jpg[/img][/quote]

Buckethead, why did you cut the picture of Lisa off at the ankles? I sure wanted to see those 10 inch heels. I suppose it doesn''t matter because I counted she is at least 28 bricks tall without them. I calculate that at approximately seven feet.

[/quote]

They''re not bricks, they are steps (imagine an escalator that has broken down).

[Joanna Grey 0]

[quote user="Buckethead"][quote user="Sports Desk - Pete"]Intriguing graphs that sadly mean nothing to me. I always thought the figues on the left were supposed to go up?[/quote]

The graphs show the position (as measured in visitor traffic) of the Pinkun website in the top 100,000 websites worldwide. With an average position of 82,931, the Pink ''Un is ranked 40,000 positions higher than the TWTD site ie. has considerably more traffic. The summer silly season sees the traffic rise to a peak comfortably inside the top 50,000 sites worldwide so all those Ameobi rumours weren''t such a waste of 0''s and 1''s after all though I doubt you actually use these figures to strengthen your advertsising position.
 Of course if you take into consideration that there are 82,930 porn sites in the world this actually proves the Pink Un to be the most popular site out there closely followed by Google and the Ebay/Paypal complaints page. FWIW the average position of the line does go up from left to right over the last three years.
[/quote]

Old Mo Huggins got it right about computers and journalist then.

[Evil Monkey 52]

This thread is remarkable.  5 pages of platitudes and point-scoring from the usual suspects, all because a weekly column is being axed.

Butler, CA - if you want to get involved in the discussion over on Kick It Off about the perceived declining standards and quality of the Pinkun messageboards, then why not sign up, make yourself an account, and get involved, rather than selectively copying and pasting LQ''s posts to suit your own agendas?

I would imagine that both of you have enough time, wits and intelligence to interact in a debate without resulting to pettiness, so why not come on over and prove yourselves worthy?  It would no doubt be a lively and enjoyable discussion, as long as the childishness is left at the door (along with dirty hob-nail boots).

[PurpleCanary 6,366]

---Dragging this thread kicking and screaming back to the original point...Since

Adam Aiken mentioned me I might as well make a few things clear. It is

true I''ve criticised his column on, I think, three occasions. But there

has never been any animus behind these attacks; they have been based

purely on a disinterested assessment of his efforts from someone who

knows the difference between good and bad journalism.The first

time was because he seemed to have no conception of how appallingly

amateurish had been Archant''s coverage of Cullumgate.And I only

intervened on this occasion because the Pink ''Un branch of SoFoCoCoToes

(the Society for the Creation of Conspiracy Theories) decided there was

some Machiavellian purpose behind the axing of his column.The

truth is that writing a column is a much harder trick to pull off than

it seems from the outside. As Woman In The Stands has already

discovered. And keeping it going is even harder. Unless you are very,

very good any columnist runs out of things to say after a while. Even

Keith Waterhouse had his dull days. Mainly, it seemed, when I read him,

but perhaps I was just unlucky.These things, as I suspect Aiken

would acknowledge, have a shelf-life and the three years that his

column has lasted is pretty much par for the course. The SoFoCoCoToes

(Pink ''Un branch) needs to look elsewhere for its latest conspiracy.

[nutty nigel 7,897]

[quote user="Evil Monkey"]

(along with dirty hob-nail boots).

[/quote]

And he''s got such a job to pull them up
That he calls them daisy roots. [8]

[;)]

What is this kick it off you speak of...

Do they have a free bet?

 

[Evil Monkey 52]

[quote user="nutty nigel"][quote user="Evil Monkey"]

(along with dirty hob-nail boots).

[/quote]

And he''s got such a job to pull them up
That he calls them daisy roots. [8]

[;)]

What is this kick it off you speak of...

Do they have a free bet?

 

[/quote]

www.kickitoff.co.uk

Alas it doesn''t have a free bet, but I personally mentioned it as the main reason to carry on with the Pinkun, because however much I post on the main boards on here, I''ll nearly always be sniffing around the IJNF forum and the Free Bet thread... everyone''s allowed their guilty pleasures! [:)]

[The Butler 0]

[quote user="Evil Monkey"]

This thread is remarkable.  5 pages of platitudes and point-scoring from the usual suspects, all because a weekly column is being axed.

Butler, CA - if you want to get involved in the discussion over on Kick It Off about the perceived declining standards and quality of the Pinkun messageboards, then why not sign up, make yourself an account, and get involved, rather than selectively copying and pasting LQ''s posts to suit your own agendas?

I would imagine that both of you have enough time, wits and intelligence to interact in a debate without resulting to pettiness, so why not come on over and prove yourselves worthy?  It would no doubt be a lively and enjoyable discussion, as long as the childishness is left at the door (along with dirty hob-nail boots).

[/quote]

Nice defence EM but I notice your attitude towards the Pinkun posters is little less than contempt.

LQ made statements that were again untrue and aimed at her usual targets. She does not like debate but sulks when challenged.

It is not just about a weekly collumn it has a far deeper reason. You are inteligent work it out.

By the way I am on Kick it Off but find it a bit too sanitised but look forward to it getting better as I am sure it will.

[The Butler 0]

[quote user="PurpleCanary"]---

Dragging this thread kicking and screaming back to the original point...

Since Adam Aiken mentioned me I might as well make a few things clear. It is true I''ve criticised his column on, I think, three occasions. But there has never been any animus behind these attacks; they have been based purely on a disinterested assessment of his efforts from someone who knows the difference between good and bad journalism.

The first time was because he seemed to have no conception of how appallingly amateurish had been Archant''s coverage of Cullumgate.

And I only intervened on this occasion because the Pink ''Un branch of SoFoCoCoToes (the Society for the Creation of Conspiracy Theories) decided there was some Machiavellian purpose behind the axing of his column.

The truth is that writing a column is a much harder trick to pull off than it seems from the outside. As Woman In The Stands has already discovered. And keeping it going is even harder. Unless you are very, very good any columnist runs out of things to say after a while. Even Keith Waterhouse had his dull days. Mainly, it seemed, when I read him, but perhaps I was just unlucky.

These things, as I suspect Aiken would acknowledge, have a shelf-life and the three years that his column has lasted is pretty much par for the course. The SoFoCoCoToes (Pink ''Un branch) needs to look elsewhere for its latest conspiracy.[/quote]

Source please!

Are you that well informed as to know what Archants reasons are.

It does seem strange that a popular column(with a lot of readers) is axed at this particular time.

Could we not have a column from "insider" with his views direct from the board. I am sure no one would think it was propoganda.

[PurpleCanary 6,366]

[quote user="The Butler"]

Source please!

Are you that well informed as to know what Archants reasons are.

It does seem strange that a popular column(with a lot of readers) is axed at this particular time.

Could we not have a column from "insider" with his views direct from the board. I am sure no one would think it was propoganda.

[/quote]Butler, I don''t need to provide a source! I was explaining how these things generally work, and what Archant''s reasons probably are. Even the best columnists get axed after a time because they end up running out of things to say.The posters from whom you SHOULD be demanding a source are those who''ve stated, without providing one teeny piece of evidence, that this definitely IS some Machiavellian plot to silence criticism of the Carrow Road hierarchy!

[The Butler 0]

[quote user="PurpleCanary"][quote user="The Butler"]

Source please!

Are you that well informed as to know what Archants reasons are.

It does seem strange that a popular column(with a lot of readers) is axed at this particular time.

Could we not have a column from "insider" with his views direct from the board. I am sure no one would think it was propoganda.

[/quote]

Butler, I don''t need to provide a source! I was explaining how these things generally work, and what Archant''s reasons probably are. Even the best columnists get axed after a time because they end up running out of things to say.

The posters from whom you SHOULD be demanding a source are those who''ve stated, without providing one teeny piece of evidence, that this definitely IS some Machiavellian plot to silence criticism of the Carrow Road hierarchy![/quote]

True PC but his column, as I stated earlier, is still very popular so why axe it just at this time!

I am not into conspiracy theories as I think the club has enough problems to think about and deal with at present but we do seem to be losing some of the fans voices on the paper.

Some say that even Gedges weekly bit is under threat so other that Chris Lakey ,who will be left to speak in the papers about fans worries and thoughts.

So there may not be an underlying reason but from another view there might just be cause for concern.

[ACE 0]

OK I had to come over and have a look, its a bit like looking at a train crash.

I find it a bit sad that this thread is basically about concern with corporate agendas, yet a run-by-fans forum, that is evidently visited by many of you, is only being used to produce quotes to attack a fellow city fan.I find that quite depressing personally. 

(PS, Butler, feel free to come over and de-sanitize it, its not going to do it on its own is it.)

[ca 1]

[quote user="Evil Monkey"]

Butler, CA - if you want to get involved in the discussion over on Kick It Off about the perceived declining standards and quality of the Pinkun messageboards, then why not sign up, make yourself an account, and get involved, rather than selectively copying and pasting LQ''s posts to suit your own agendas?[/quote]

 

I am registered on there but there are only so many hours in a day to post ( on my favourite websites) and besides any opinions I have about the standard or quality of the pinkun site will be posted on here rather than elsewhere.

 

[First Wizard 0]

[quote user="PurpleCanary"]Are you that well informed as to know what Archants reasons are.[/quote]

Here are Archants reasons:

[img]http://ghostline.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/pkfz-whitewash-070926.jpg[/img]

[Shack Attack 0]

[quote user="Evil Monkey"]

Butler, CA - if you want to get involved in the discussion over on Kick It Off about the perceived declining standards and quality of the Pinkun messageboards, then why not sign up, make yourself an account, and get involved, rather than selectively copying and pasting LQ''s posts to suit your own agendas?

[/quote]

So let me get this straight EM. What everybody really needs to do is stop posting on here and sign up to a forum where the most popular thread at the moment is ''Madness on the Pinkun''

http://www.kickitoff.co.uk/norwich-city-forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=420

A thread that sees various posters referring to this forum as ''The Oink ''Un''. Very witty chaps [:|]

A thread that contains the following words from yourself :

"Yup. Even tonight, when I''m pretty p*ssed off with a few of the performances and that of the referee (sorry, but that was never a penalty) I still can''t find a thread on the Pinkun that inspires me to join in."

This despite the fact that there were plenty of threads (aside from the one set up by Smudger that you go on to complain about) discussing the formation, the performance of Corey Smith, what Luke Daley offers to the side and various rants about the referee. Threads that would have benefitted from knowlegable and level headed fans who could rise above the knee-jerk merchants who inhabit every internet based football discussion I''ve ever witnessed. Some posters raised some very good points on these subjects and they would have benefitted from more people with a basic knowledge of football debating these points. Perhaps you boys (and girls of course) from KIO aren''t up to it and that''s why you couldn''t find a thread that you felt comfortable joining in with. That''s fine but don''t sit over there bitching about ''declining standards'', it''s most undignified [:$]

[Daphne 0]

As I started this thread with an innocent question about the fate of Fan''s Eye, which was very quickly answered (thanks Pete!), I am ignoring the points scoring and sniping and getting back to the OP - thanks Purple.

I am fed up that my favourite EDP column is to be axed. I did think of cancelling my order - but that would hurt my local village shop and the paperboy more than Archant. I will be writing to Archant to state my annoyance. Perhaps others who feel equally fed up could do the same?

[nutty nigel 7,897]

[quote user="Daphne formerly Old Yellow Bird"]As I started this thread with an innocent question about the fate of Fan''s Eye, which was very quickly answered (thanks Pete!), I am ignoring the points scoring and sniping and getting back to the OP - thanks Purple. I am fed up that my favourite EDP column is to be axed. I did think of cancelling my order - but that would hurt my local village shop and the paperboy more than Archant. I will be writing to Archant to state my annoyance. Perhaps others who feel equally fed up could do the same?[/quote]

Not if you changed the order to another publication Daphne. Any suggestions[:^)] I prefer the Cromer Crab Line but it''s free so wouldn''t help your local village shop much.

 

[Kathy 823]

[quote user="nutty nigel"]

[quote user="Daphne formerly Old Yellow Bird"]As I started this thread with an innocent question about the fate of Fan''s Eye, which was very quickly answered (thanks Pete!), I am ignoring the points scoring and sniping and getting back to the OP - thanks Purple. I am fed up that my favourite EDP column is to be axed. I did think of cancelling my order - but that would hurt my local village shop and the paperboy more than Archant. I will be writing to Archant to state my annoyance. Perhaps others who feel equally fed up could do the same?[/quote]

Not if you changed the order to another publication Daphne. Any suggestions[:^)] I prefer the Cromer Crab Line but it''s free so wouldn''t help your local village shop much.

 

[/quote]

.......and instead you could read Henry''s Blog(g)...................

[nutty nigel 7,897]

You just reminded me of a lifeboat joke Kathy but I''d better put it on the relevant thread I guess!

 

[PurpleCanary 6,366]

[quote user="Kathy"][quote user="nutty nigel"]

[quote user="Daphne formerly Old Yellow Bird"]As I started this thread with an innocent question about the fate of Fan''s Eye, which was very quickly answered (thanks Pete!), I am ignoring the points scoring and sniping and getting back to the OP - thanks Purple. I am fed up that my favourite EDP column is to be axed. I did think of cancelling my order - but that would hurt my local village shop and the paperboy more than Archant. I will be writing to Archant to state my annoyance. Perhaps others who feel equally fed up could do the same?[/quote]

Not if you changed the order to another publication Daphne. Any suggestions[:^)] I prefer the Cromer Crab Line but it''s free so wouldn''t help your local village shop much.

 

[/quote]

.......and instead you could read Henry''s Blog(g)...................

[/quote]I thought someone should acknowledge Kathy''s Henry Blogg joke...Back

on topic, I understand people''s fears generally over the Stephan

Phillips appointment, but The Strange Case of the Disappearing Column

seems like a lot of fuss over not very much. The column, after all, has

only partly disappeared.What fans should be looking out for is

any influence on what really matters, and that is the editorial policy

at Archant Towers towards NCFC on important issues.And the

obvious issue is the future ownership of the club. Over Cullumgate the

EDP''s editorial line was critical of the NCFC directors and sympathetic

towards Cullum. And as far as the news coverage was concerned, for

whatever reason, the tough questions that needed to be asked of him

when he went public (questions that even pro-Cullum fans were asking)

never were.Only after talks had broken down did the EDP pretend

to indulge in some journalism by firing off half a dozen or so

questions in the direction of Cullum''s retreating back. Questions which

he didn''t deign to answer.Despite that the EDP still backed

him. "The powers that be looked a gift horse in the mouth." And "an

open goal has been missed". Mixed metaphor overload. "Many fans will be

hoping that Mr Cullum has a change of heart."But if he DID have

a change of heart, and reappeared tomorrow, with the same proposal,

would the EDP still back him? If not, then fans might have some

ammunition for the argument that Archant has been nobbled. 

[Tangible Fixed Assets anyone? 0]

Save Fan''s Eye!

 

[The Butler 0]

[quote user="Tangible Fixed Assets anyone"]

Save Fan''s Eye!

 

[/quote]

Be careful TFA as supporters could be FANEYE''S

I am not walking round with a placard that reads that for anyone![:D]