Classic double think by NCFC

[William Darby 0]

Lay in on thick that the two who ran onto the pitch was at fault, they had a physical confrontation, they caused the trouble but...."In addition, we have put into place some changes to safety procedures

on matchdays as a result of the findings of the independent inquiry,

which is still on-going."It is either their fault or not,  if it was their responsibility to behave, the safety  procedures don''t need changing. 

[Mister Chops 7]

[quote user="Mr McNallys Alter Ego"]Lay in on thick that the two who ran onto the pitch was at fault, they had a physical confrontation, they caused the trouble but...."In addition, we have put into place some changes to safety procedures

on matchdays as a result of the findings of the independent inquiry,

which is still on-going."It is either their fault or not,  if it was their responsibility to behave, the safety  procedures don''t need changing.  [/quote]Sorry but that''s clearly complete rubbish.  You''re basically saying that "we don''t need to change any safety procedures as long as everyone promises to behave themselves."  Think about how stupid that sounds.Two people ran straight at the manager, and as a result of this action the club has changed the safety procedures, presumably to minimise the risk of this happening again, or at least to offer better protection to the managers/subs if it happens again.I don''t mind people slating the club when it''s justified, but this is ridiculous.

[William Darby 0]

[quote user="Mister Chops"][quote user="Mr McNallys Alter Ego"]Lay in on thick that the two who ran onto the pitch was at fault, they had a physical confrontation, they caused the trouble but...."In addition, we have put into place some changes to safety procedures

on matchdays as a result of the findings of the independent inquiry,

which is still on-going."It is either their fault or not,  if it was their responsibility to behave, the safety  procedures don''t need changing.  [/quote]Sorry but that''s clearly complete rubbish.  You''re basically saying that "we don''t need to change any safety procedures as long as everyone promises to behave themselves."  Think about how stupid that sounds.Two people ran straight at the manager, and as a result of this action the club has changed the safety procedures, presumably to minimise the risk of this happening again, or at least to offer better protection to the managers/subs if it happens again.I don''t mind people slating the club when it''s justified, but this is ridiculous.[/quote]Rubbish eh?  Think about this if you are able.  Nothing will actually stop anyone running onto the pitch unless there''s an 70s-80s style 15ft fence.  What prevents fans from doing now and in the future is personal responsibility.  The two that ran on, yes put a practically unenforceable ban on them, punish them.  But to give it all the safety procedures this, safety procedures that is pathetic.  It''s a red herring it hasn''t altered a thing.All the Club had to do is say was, ''Next time anybody does it, you will be punished by law''.

[Mister Chops 7]

What if the safety procedures are now "stewards will rush them, rugby tackle them and sit on them until the Police arrive to cart them away."Wouldn''t that alter anything?

[William Darby 0]

What if half of them are too old, too fat and on twenty per day and couldn''t catch a cold?  And the other half would be too scared in case they were tonked back?But it''s not going to happen again, not because of new safety procedures, but because we''re all not going to play that shiite again for another 50 years.

[Mello Yello 2,279]

Isn''t that Boro fan still in solitary confinement in Rudolph Hess''s old cell for flinging his season ticket at Steve Umbrella who was then Boro manager?