Pinks 0 Posted August 20, 2009 Just thinking about Delia''s insistence that someone taking over the club should have Norfolk roots and should have the best interest of the club at heart got me thinking about what her reign has bought about fot Norwich City.Drunken outburst on the pitch at half timeRelegationSack a manager for a reported £600k settlementSack another managerTreat Huckerby shabbilyDrunken outburst at the Norfolk ShowSack another managerGet relegated to the 3rd tier of football for the 1st time in 50 yearsLose 7-1, the worst home defeat in over a hundred yearsSack another manager, treat Gunn shabbilyIncrease debts to record proportionsOccupy the relegation places in League One after 3 gamesPoach another clubs manager Makes you think how much worse a foreign investor would have to be to beat that lot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
InLambertWeTrust! 0 Posted August 20, 2009 I agree with all of that apart from the Hucks point.It was Roeder and Roeder alone who was responsible for getting rid of Hucks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WeAreYellows49 0 Posted August 20, 2009 [quote user="CT "]I agree with all of that apart from the Hucks point.It was Roeder and Roeder alone who was responsible for getting rid of Hucks.[/quote] So Roeder had 100% control over who the board could sack? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dion Dublin=Legend 0 Posted August 20, 2009 [quote user="WeAreYellows49"][quote user="CT "]I agree with all of that apart from the Hucks point.It was Roeder and Roeder alone who was responsible for getting rid of Hucks.[/quote] So Roeder had 100% control over who the board could sack?[/quote]Huckerby wasn''t sacked, he was released at the end of his contract. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
InLambertWeTrust! 0 Posted August 20, 2009 [quote user="Dion DublinLegend"][quote user="WeAreYellows49"][quote user="CT "]I agree with all of that apart from the Hucks point.It was Roeder and Roeder alone who was responsible for getting rid of Hucks.[/quote] So Roeder had 100% control over who the board could sack?[/quote]Huckerby wasn''t sacked, he was released at the end of his contract.[/quote]Exactly and mr roeder didnt offer him a new contract. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pinks 0 Posted August 20, 2009 [quote user="CT "]I agree with all of that apart from the Hucks point.It was Roeder and Roeder alone who was responsible for getting rid of Hucks.[/quote]So you don''t think Delia has any say in the matter?I''m not talking renewing of contracts, I''m talking a chance to say farewell and thank you.Where does the buck stop? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
UEAstudent 0 Posted August 20, 2009 Do you think Delia SHOULD have a say on which players are signed or kept on? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WeAreYellows49 0 Posted August 20, 2009 [quote user="CT "][quote user="Dion DublinLegend"][quote user="WeAreYellows49"] [quote user="CT "]I agree with all of that apart from the Hucks point.It was Roeder and Roeder alone who was responsible for getting rid of Hucks.[/quote] So Roeder had 100% control over who the board could sack?[/quote]Huckerby wasn''t sacked, he was released at the end of his contract.[/quote]Exactly and mr roeder didnt offer him a new contract.[/quote] I am sure the owners would have a say in who goes and who doesn''t. The buck always stops at the top and at the top were the board.Even if they never offered him a renewal of his contract, then they way they let him leave the club was an absolute bloody disgrace IMO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pinks 0 Posted August 20, 2009 [quote user="UEAstudent"]Do you think Delia SHOULD have a say on which players are signed or kept on?[/quote]Like I said"I''m not talking renewing of contracts, I''m talking a chance to say farewell and thank you." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
InLambertWeTrust! 0 Posted August 20, 2009 [quote user="UEAstudent"]Do you think Delia SHOULD have a say on which players are signed or kept on?[/quote]We''d be bottom of league 1 if that happened.Oh wait! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pinks 0 Posted August 20, 2009 [quote user="CT "][quote user="UEAstudent"]Do you think Delia SHOULD have a say on which players are signed or kept on?[/quote]We''d be bottom of league 1 if that happened.Oh wait![/quote]To be fair, if my dog has chosen the team with random pee squirts we would probably have more points now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Longy 1 Posted August 20, 2009 [quote user="WEEN_NASTY"][quote user="UEAstudent"]Do you think Delia SHOULD have a say on which players are signed or kept on?[/quote]Like I said"I''m not talking renewing of contracts, I''m talking a chance to say farewell and thank you."[/quote]Lol as much as admire Huckerby''s contribution to the club and blame Delia (and the board) for the mess we are in, this seems a bit ridic. What do you want him paraded before the fans at the start of last season, if you hang around the club enough, you will get to thank Darren in person like a lot of us have. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites