JonnytheCanary 0 Posted August 21, 2009 would anyone like to sign himi know we have holt and maric but platt was top class when he came down here on the opening game of the seasona big forward with pace and a good headyour thoughts? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brendo 0 Posted August 21, 2009 I think he is a good striker, he''s agressive which is a good factor to have, Rooney being an excellent example. Doubt he would come though :(And not sure if him and Holt would make such a good partnership. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Bump 0 Posted August 21, 2009 Funny how everyone didn''t want him when we were linked with him and then he performs well against a mediocre defence and suddenly he''s a good signing? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cufcone 0 Posted August 21, 2009 Believe me you wouldn''t want him. Against you was a one off,not in the same class as Holt. Slow and at times can be very lazy,gets beaten in the air too much and most of the time couldn''t hit a barn door. But if you offer 300k you can have him Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lincs CR 0 Posted August 21, 2009 Agreed BumpPlatt did well against us becuase we were AWFUL. That performance doesn''t mean he will turn out to be one of the best strikers in the league which is what Norwich need... considering the target is still promotion according to McNally. I honestly think Holt has a lot more to offer than CP Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
missing in action? 0 Posted August 21, 2009 being good v norwich is not an indication of skill. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryan1992 0 Posted August 21, 2009 Isnt there a clause in Lamberts contract that we cant get any Col U players this transfer period? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jacks ncfc 0 Posted August 21, 2009 this could work with holt doing the flick on''s and platt using his pace and his muscle to get past defenders and put the ball in the back of the net its a bit what cody could do more often but maybe platts muscle would work better than cody because he hasnt got muscle like platt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jibbajabba 0 Posted August 21, 2009 @Ryan, we''re pressing for that clause in any agreement we make with you - but obviously the reason compensation is going to be paid is because there was agreement.@Jack, "Platt''s pace" - now that did make me laugh, seriously, I want to keep him and all that, but he''s more dead bolt than Usain bolt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jibbajabba 0 Posted August 21, 2009 @Ryan, we''re pressing for that clause in any agreement we make with you - but obviously the reason compensation is going to be paid is because there was *NO* agreement.@Jack, "Platt''s pace" - now that did make me laugh, seriously, I want to keep him and all that, but he''s more dead bolt than Usain bolt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nexus_Canary 1,013 Posted August 21, 2009 [quote user="Mr. Bump"]Funny how everyone didn''t want him when we were linked with him and then he performs well against a mediocre defence and suddenly he''s a good signing?[/quote]Bingo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites