CANARY CHARGE 0 Posted August 16, 2009 [quote user="nutty nigel"]Many fans wanted Crook everytime it was vacant since he left us. Now we can have him no one wants him. Why doesn''t that surprise me. Tell you what, we could do worse and we usually do do worse. [/quote]Because you group most fans together,fact is if crook gets it we are no further forward.....Mcnally wont do this! (i hope) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
O.T.B.C 0 Posted August 16, 2009 [quote user="nutty nigel"]Many fans wanted Crook everytime it was vacant since he left us. Now we can have him no one wants him. Why doesn''t that surprise me. Tell you what, we could do worse and we usually do do worse. [/quote]I said that on another post too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rum Ol Boy 0 Posted August 16, 2009 you''re not the caller from canary call are you???? City need to break away from appointing unproven crap......we need a strong character who knows the game....not some explayer wannabe Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scooby 0 Posted August 16, 2009 [quote user="Norwich"]By the way who''s tits say this?[/quote]The tit on the OP! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
canary cherub 1 Posted August 16, 2009 [quote user="wally webb"]McNally never said it was an outside appointment, Crook is the new manger. I am Roy Waller if you must know.[/quote]Oh clear off Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barry Brockes 147 Posted August 16, 2009 Would this be the same Crook who found us Carney, Killen and Theodropalot? No thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pete_norw 0 Posted August 16, 2009 No won''t be Chippy, he was the one who reccomended the Ozzy keeper, no more better than Gunny, and if we were to be told that Chippy is the man, I think he would have been in charge on Saurday Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,531 Posted August 16, 2009 [quote user="canary cherub "][quote user="wally webb"]McNally never said it was an outside appointment, Crook is the new manger. I am Roy Waller if you must know.[/quote]Oh clear off [/quote]That''s no way to speak to Roy[:@]He''s a legend, they may even name a lounge after him[:O]But then again he has been known to wear scum colours and that could come back to haunt him[;)] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
canary cherub 1 Posted August 16, 2009 [quote user="canary cherub "][quote user="wally webb"]McNally never said it was an outside appointment, Crook is the new manger. I am Roy Waller if you must know.[/quote]Oh clear off [/quote]TROLL ALERT FOLKS Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
O.T.B.C 0 Posted August 16, 2009 [quote user="Rum ol boy"]you''re not the caller from canary call are you???? City need to break away from appointing unproven crap......we need a strong character who knows the game....not some explayer wannabe[/quote]Glen Roeder? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harleston Canary 0 Posted August 16, 2009 [quote user="wally webb"]As the titie says Crook will be named new manger on Tuesday,[/quote]I''m glad he''s going to be the new manger - apparently the horses have been complaining that it''s difficult to get at the hay in the old one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Excited Canary 19 Posted August 16, 2009 ^ Haha, classic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stranger44 0 Posted August 16, 2009 [quote user="suffolk canary"] [quote user="wally webb"]As the titie says Crook will be named new manger on Tuesday,[/quote]I''m glad he''s going to be the new manger - apparently the horses have been complaining that it''s difficult to get at the hay in the old one.[/quote]I wasn''t in the best of moods for various reasons but that made me laugh out loud - thanks!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kdncfc 0 Posted August 16, 2009 If Crook was going to be given the job I''m pretty sure it would have been announced by now, I''ll be very disappointed if he does get it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZLF 274 Posted August 17, 2009 Crook Butterworth Crosby Haseelbaink - all completely the wrong type of manager.Look at the Exeter game, no Maric on teh bench when a target man alternative was needed, and settling for a 11 draw by taking off hoolahan and bringing on the defensive lappin - that not going to bring you three points - far too negative an approach to chasing the promotion dream... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whoareyou? 0 Posted August 17, 2009 We may as well give up if he is appointed.No recent experience of english football, a style of play that will not get us out of this division..and it would seem from the players he''s recommended recently, not a clue what makes a quality player! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Methane 0 Posted August 17, 2009 Manager of what? Pilch sports department? An aussie themed bar on Prince of Wales Road? Butterworth tipped for management in UCB, supervising the filling of the popcorn buckets.Was that Don Howe I saw going into the cleaning cupboard? Maybe we''re getting another caretaker manager Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Romantic 0 Posted August 17, 2009 [quote user="Norwich"]If he is appointed then I will drive down the road and support Notts County, seriously. I have had enough of driving 3 hours there and back each week to watch the rubbish that is served up. Imagine how much money I will save by going to County, and I am sure I will get so much more pleasure at the rate that they''re going...![/quote]Good o! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,531 Posted August 17, 2009 [quote user="ZippersLeftFoot"]Crook Butterworth Crosby Haseelbaink - all completely the wrong type of manager.Look at the Exeter game, no Maric on teh bench when a target man alternative was needed, and settling for a 11 draw by taking off hoolahan and bringing on the defensive lappin - that not going to bring you three points - far too negative an approach to chasing the promotion dream...[/quote]What I find totally staggering is that everybody saw the difference that replacing Gill with Hughes made a few days previously. It was a change crying out to be made in the second half to win the game. The changes we did make seemed to suggest we wanted to hold on for a draw. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Binky 0 Posted August 17, 2009 What I find staggering is that everyone assumes that a "big" or experienced name will ensure success. We had that in Roeder I thought. Big names will be there a plenty of course - the compensation gravy train must look very attractive.I just hope it''s someone who plays the beautiful game - and preferably someone who played it, though that is less important I agree. Can''t see it being Crook in a million years - he''s probably only just ahead of Fotheringham and Roeder - but if it was, then I for one would support him until he''s had a fair chance. We don''t know just how much blame for recent results can be attributed to him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Norfolk Dumpling 14 Posted August 17, 2009 I shall support whoever is appointed just as I and others supported Gunny although we feared for the Canary Legend right from the very start. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ca 1 Posted August 17, 2009 [quote user="wally webb"]As the titie says Crook will be named new manger on Tuesday,[/quote] That isn''t true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,531 Posted August 17, 2009 [quote user="Binky"]What I find staggering is that everyone assumes that a "big" or experienced name will ensure success. We had that in Roeder I thought. Big names will be there a plenty of course - the compensation gravy train must look very attractive.I just hope it''s someone who plays the beautiful game - and preferably someone who played it, though that is less important I agree. Can''t see it being Crook in a million years - he''s probably only just ahead of Fotheringham and Roeder - but if it was, then I for one would support him until he''s had a fair chance. We don''t know just how much blame for recent results can be attributed to him.[/quote]As my friend Tangie would say....WELL SAID!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,531 Posted August 17, 2009 [quote user="Binky"]What I find staggering is that everyone assumes that a "big" or experienced name will ensure success. We had that in Roeder I thought. Big names will be there a plenty of course - the compensation gravy train must look very attractive.I just hope it''s someone who plays the beautiful game - and preferably someone who played it, though that is less important I agree. Can''t see it being Crook in a million years - he''s probably only just ahead of Fotheringham and Roeder - but if it was, then I for one would support him until he''s had a fair chance. We don''t know just how much blame for recent results can be attributed to him.[/quote]As my friend Tangie would say....WELL SAID!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
I am a Banana 0 Posted August 17, 2009 [quote user="Sideshow Tim"]Absolute tosh. If this were true i would be one of the first to know. Go back to sleep![/quote]why?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Empty Mirror 0 Posted August 17, 2009 It is not Crook. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wizard 0 Posted August 17, 2009 [quote user="I am a Banana"][quote user="Sideshow Tim"]Absolute tosh. If this were true i would be one of the first to know. Go back to sleep![/quote]why?? [/quote]Look no further!http://www.edp24.co.uk/content/edp24/sport/football/norwich-city/story.aspx?brand=EDPOnline&category=SportNorwich&tBrand=EDPOnline&tCategory=xDefault&itemid=NOED16%20Aug%202009%2018%3A28%3A27%3A653 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Matt Morriss 69 Posted August 17, 2009 McNally says new manager will have no NCFC connection. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
