dhickl 0 Posted August 6, 2009 one of the "Championship''s best young players"http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2009/aug/06/championship-five-best-young-players Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Excited Canary 19 Posted August 6, 2009 Oh why did we let him go! [:@] Roeder did do some silly things to say the least... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VAUX 0 Posted August 6, 2009 Another Rodent cock-up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Need we say anymore???????????? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Green and Yellow 0 Posted August 6, 2009 he went because Rodent was and is a useless c***. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Camuldonum 0 Posted August 6, 2009 He has had a lot of stick from a section of their crowd though. Hopefully Tyler going to Luton will put an end to that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
norwichrossi 0 Posted August 7, 2009 completely 100% agree Baldrick :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BBFF 0 Posted August 7, 2009 If the club/board wanted a new burger restaurant it had to be paid for somehow. It should have been called Lewis''s not Yellows. FOOTBALL MUST COME FIRST Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sam. 0 Posted August 7, 2009 He would have gone anyway if peterbourgh were giving him games and such he would have wanted to go there not sit on our bench we were lucky to get such a good deal on him with all them extra clauses. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZLF 271 Posted August 7, 2009 Who is suprised he is one of the 5 best young prospects? He was training with the England squad last year despite being with a league one team.He is a talented player who we were not going to use for a couple of seasons. The boy is talented and I hope he has a very successful career. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dean Coneys boots 1,398 Posted August 7, 2009 It is a tough one. On the one hand we can bleat at the decision when he goes onto to be brilliant- but we really were not in the position to offer him first team games when he left and he would not have wanted to miss the opportunity. Secondly we must remember that we actually got a very good deal at the time. I actually think it is one decision Rodent got right...Rudd and Steer are both equally promising and even now they are not quite ready- hence the arrival of the Spurs sub Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yellow Wal 314 Posted August 7, 2009 Taking everything into consideration the decision was right at the time. Yes we might well have had a good goalkeeper on our books ..... but we have three now, two of whom are younger and possibly showing more promise. The loan, I suspect, was made to cover any possible problems of work permits and paperwork being completed in time. I fully expect Declan Rudd to be the back up keeper when the loan expires. Obviously it takes time to set up loans and, if Theo''s paperwork had taken longer than it did, we could have had Rudd and Steer as our only two keepers.This loan obviously covered what might have been an ''emergency'' situation which was what the loan system was intended for. I am extremely happy that we do not have any other loans and hope we don''t have any more! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
