Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
.

Re: What have Brighton got that we haven't?

Recommended Posts

As another thread confirmed, they have paid at least 300k for Dickinson, not 100k. But hey, why let the facts get in the way of another anti-board rant... even if the majority of the board are completely new anyway! Idiots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Brighton have agreed a fee with Derby for Norwich target Liam Dickinson.

Derby boss Nigel Clough has revealed that the Rams have accepted an offer for Liam Dickinson from Brighton.

Dickinson has been the subject of two ''small'' bids from Norwich as they bid to fill the target man hole up front.

It was believed that County wanted to recoup a sizeable portion of the £750k they paid Stockport for a player who has yet to appear in their first team. The reported fee agreed with Brighton, however, is said to be just £100k.

Bryan Gunn has other irons in the fire in the form of trialists Goran Maric, Troy Powell, Michael Bridges and Chris Craig, as well as maintaining an interest in Crystal Palace''s Alan Lee.

.. blame the person who wrote this then ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="canaryjock"]As another thread confirmed, they have paid at least 300k for Dickinson, not 100k. But hey, why let the facts get in the way of another anti-board rant... even if the majority of the board are completely new anyway! Idiots.[/quote]

you muppet....what a good stat ncfc is in,hope your proud?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote user="coro"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qNDon9_82U[/quote]

At least we can sing that at Carrow Road this season

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote user="canaryjock"]As another thread confirmed, they have paid at least 300k for Dickinson, not 100k. But hey, why let the facts get in the way of another anti-board rant... even if the majority of the board are completely new anyway! Idiots.[/quote]

Granted.....but we still couldn''t afford £300k and Brighton could.....

The point still remains that we can''t beat tinpot teams to signatures because somehow they have more money (and ambition) than us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="Paint Me Yellow"]

[quote user="canaryjock"]As another thread confirmed, they have paid at least 300k for Dickinson, not 100k. But hey, why let the facts get in the way of another anti-board rant... even if the majority of the board are completely new anyway! Idiots.[/quote]

Granted.....but we still couldn''t afford £300k and Brighton could.....

The point still remains that we can''t beat tinpot teams to signatures because somehow they have more money (and ambition) than us.

[/quote]

Well if you dont like it try going about 40 miles down the road, they have money, and in a diff div., I think you might like it down there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brighton is ten times the place Norwich is. And i like Norwich.

They also have Tony Bloom. He''ll get a whole lot done for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote user="singing canary"]Brighton have agreed a fee with Derby for Norwich target Liam Dickinson. Derby boss Nigel Clough has revealed that the Rams have accepted an offer for Liam Dickinson from Brighton. Dickinson has been the subject of two ''small'' bids from Norwich as they bid to fill the target man hole up front. It was believed that County wanted to recoup a sizeable portion of the £750k they paid Stockport for a player who has yet to appear in their first team. The reported fee agreed with Brighton, however, is said to be just £100k. Bryan Gunn has other irons in the fire in the form of trialists Goran Maric, Troy Powell, Michael Bridges and Chris Craig, as well as maintaining an interest in Crystal Palace''s Alan Lee. .. blame the person who wrote this then ...[/quote]

No, laugh at the people who believed it. There were some on here who thought that it was a suspiciously low figure and waited for a more sensible figure to be released.

And the homophobic content of this thread is bordering on illegality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...