Hog 0 Posted June 30, 2009 http://www.ciderspace.co.uk/ASP/news/news.asp?NewsItemId=9604 According to the article it seems to be suggesting that we didn''t have the finances to sign a Yeovil player last year! Surely this can''t be right or am I reading this wrong? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
singing canary 0 Posted June 30, 2009 im not sure on that mate it must of cost us a fortune on loan players . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rjwc22 0 Posted June 30, 2009 Who knows how much Yeovil wanted for him anyway. You do not have to be buying from Bayern Munich to be put off by the asking price.No surprise that our finances were limited. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Chirp 0 Posted June 30, 2009 He was on trial and Roeder said at the time that he was good but a little to similar to what we had here already. Therefore, it is likely that norwich decided he was too pricy to bring in a player who didn''t bring anythnig new to the club. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joanna Grey 0 Posted June 30, 2009 That quote is a bit strange, does anyone think that Clark was misquoted?He just didn''t have the finances to pursue the deal. Perhaps Peltier could not afford the bus fare to get here? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
