Willmeister 35 Posted June 21, 2009 Apologies if this has been posted before, but Skysports says we are interested. Has a pretty good goal scoring record at this level and I think could do a pretty good job here.Article Here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JuanVelasco 27 Posted June 21, 2009 Pretty average in my opinion and only 5ft 10......... Personally I would prefer Grant Holt or Alan Lee.... still, beggers cant be choosers..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Iwan is God 0 Posted June 21, 2009 the link isn''t to any story! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Bump 0 Posted June 21, 2009 [quote user="Iwan is God"]the link isn''t to any story![/quote]Yes it is! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary_on_the Trent 0 Posted June 21, 2009 wouldn''t be a bad signing at this level, the guy has a good scoring record and is a real nuisance up front, always looks lively for Northern Ireland and has had a decent season at Dundee Utd Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
colneycanary 0 Posted June 21, 2009 Why is it always Charlton and Huddersfield after the same players as us. Do we share scouts or something? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JuanVelasco 27 Posted June 21, 2009 [quote user="colneycanary"]Why is it always Charlton and Huddersfield after the same players as us. Do we share scouts or something?[/quote]No we share budgets. Three skint clubs, after the same cheap players. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Bump 0 Posted June 21, 2009 [quote user="JuanVelasco"][quote user="colneycanary"]Why is it always Charlton and Huddersfield after the same players as us. Do we share scouts or something?[/quote]No we share budgets. Three skint clubs, after the same cheap players.[/quote]Huddersfield, skint? [:|] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JuanVelasco 27 Posted June 21, 2009 [quote user="Mr. Bump"][quote user="JuanVelasco"][quote user="colneycanary"]Why is it always Charlton and Huddersfield after the same players as us. Do we share scouts or something?[/quote]No we share budgets. Three skint clubs, after the same cheap players.[/quote]Huddersfield, skint? [:|][/quote]lol.... true, 500k for Simpson, forgot about that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JuanVelasco 27 Posted June 21, 2009 [quote user="JuanVelasco"][quote user="Mr. Bump"][quote user="JuanVelasco"] [quote user="colneycanary"]Why is it always Charlton and Huddersfield after the same players as us. Do we share scouts or something?[/quote]No we share budgets. Three skint clubs, after the same cheap players.[/quote]Huddersfield, skint? [:|][/quote]lol.... true, 500k for Simpson, forgot about that.[/quote]Actually apparently 500k is "well wide of the mark", and there other two signings have been bosmans........ so can you be sure that they are skint? I cant imagine them being too wealthy, unless they have some sort of investor? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Excited Canary 19 Posted June 21, 2009 Huddersfield are richer than us mate!!! (Not hard) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary_on_the Trent 0 Posted June 21, 2009 [quote user="JuanVelasco"][quote user="colneycanary"]Why is it always Charlton and Huddersfield after the same players as us. Do we share scouts or something?[/quote]No we share budgets. Three skint clubs, after the same cheap players.[/quote]3 of the clubs tipped for promotion with bigger budgets than most others in the league Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Syteanric 1 Posted June 22, 2009 [quote user="JuanVelasco"][quote user="JuanVelasco"][quote user="Mr. Bump"][quote user="JuanVelasco"] [quote user="colneycanary"]Why is it always Charlton and Huddersfield after the same players as us. Do we share scouts or something?[/quote]No we share budgets. Three skint clubs, after the same cheap players.[/quote]Huddersfield, skint? [:|][/quote]lol.... true, 500k for Simpson, forgot about that.[/quote]Actually apparently 500k is "well wide of the mark", and there other two signings have been bosmans........ so can you be sure that they are skint? I cant imagine them being too wealthy, unless they have some sort of investor?[/quote]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huddersfield_Townthey aint short of a few bob.. check out the owner....also, check out who the player of the year was in 1992...jas :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ACE 0 Posted June 22, 2009 Huddersfield have money. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheCardinal 0 Posted June 22, 2009 Getting back on topic (who gives a toss about Huddesfield?), looking at Feeney''s record, he appears to be very hit and miss. If available on the cheap, I would probably be happy to see him here, but I''d rather we went for Liam Dickinson or Grant Holt, to be perfectly honest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
we8wba 0 Posted June 22, 2009 looked good at luton few years back but simply hasnt done the goods over the past 18-24months risky signing in my opinion Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
(Northern) Irish Canary 48 Posted June 22, 2009 Having watched him play for Northern Ireland over the last few years, I would classify Feeney as a decent enough player who I think could do a job for us - if utilised in the right way. Whilst only 5ft 10", he''s actually surprisingly good in the air, though can sometimes look as if he has a bag of sand strapped to each leg when he tries to break into a sprint! Like most NI players, he would generally be considered to be of average ability but busts a gut for the cause; I know that that is not neccessarily what we are after on it''s own, but it hasn''t done NI any harm over the last 2 or 3 years! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yobocop 1,096 Posted June 22, 2009 Feeney was rubbish at Luton Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Iwan is God 0 Posted June 22, 2009 Would Rangers really be interested? Wouldn''t be a hard choice for the player really, would it?! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
colneycanary 0 Posted June 23, 2009 Can''t understand why we would want Feeney. Does not exactly have a great scoring record and he''s 29 years old! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
