Bruce Eats Walkers! 0 Posted June 15, 2009 http://carrowroad.net/cnews/modules/news/FJust reading this article, seems that you have to have a license to display fixture lists on a website or you can be fined! Personally I think this is ridiculous, did anyone else know about this? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bruce Eats Walkers! 0 Posted June 15, 2009 Sorry, try this:http://carrowroad.net/cnews/modules/news/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pete Raven 276 Posted June 15, 2009 Yes, has always been the case, and is for individual sites rather than a company which is why you''ll only ever find the fixtures on the PinkUn site, and not EDP24 and EN24 as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chichcanary 0 Posted June 15, 2009 Tis trueThere was an article about it in the current edition of When Saturday ComesIt''s mentioned at the start of this article from their web site (although it''s a different article)http://www.wsc.co.uk/content/view/3439/38/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ACE 0 Posted June 15, 2009 Its a load of corking nonsense that people cannot display the fixture list - but of course it gives the FA hundreds of inbound links from an sites to give them traffic.My advice:You can use this clause from their offical letter (I just found online) to justify it as long as it is within an "editorial context":"Without nominated fanzine status or a license there is no provision for anyfixture to appear in advance of the match being played. However, if there isan editorial preview of the next upcoming match in which the fixture ismentioned then this is unlikely to be objected to provided this is done in aclearly editorial form. Mentioning more than one fixture would not beaccepted."ORwrite to NCFC and ask for "nominated fanzine" status - if they aughotise it you can get that agreed with the FA for £1.ORSimply iframe the fixture list from the BBC - just make clear that it is content on the BBC site and is being displayed in an iframe for convenience and is in no way intended to be seen as your own content. It would be a brave company that tried to take you to court over an iframe where the content was acknowledged as being externally supplied. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites