Excellent decision

Hucks 96 · May 13, 2009

Its good to see that the Board (what''s left on them!) have ignored those blood letting morons and appointed Bryan Gunn and his team. Congratulations Gunny I''v e been watching City for 40 years and I feel sure you are the best man for the job. I am looking forward to next season already. With your own team at least we can be assured each man will give 100% for the club.

NCFC_Shaun · May 13, 2009

Aww how sweet [:)] [:|]

Come to think of it. I''ve been a Norwich fan all my life, and I''ll give 100% for the club! I''m going to apply for a place on the coaching role right now! At least it will keep you happy [:D] [Y]

Graham Humphrey · May 13, 2009

[quote user="Hucks 96"]Its good to see that the Board (what''s left on them!) have ignored those blood letting morons and appointed Bryan Gunn and his team. Congratulations Gunny I''v e been watching City for 40 years and I feel sure you are the best man for the job. I am looking forward to next season already. With your own team at least we can be assured each man will give 100% for the club.
[/quote]

Just like they motivated the players to give 100% in all those matches last season eh?

Canary Wundaboy · May 13, 2009

[quote user="Hucks 96"]Its good to see that the Board (what''s left on them!) have ignored those blood letting morons and appointed Bryan Gunn and his team. Congratulations Gunny I''v e been watching City for 40 years and I feel sure you are the best man for the job. I am looking forward to next season already. With your own team at least we can be assured each man will give 100% for the club. [/quote]A simple lesson in mathematics:19 games.5 wins= RELEGATION.That is is currently his record, with Gunn as our manager I am far from convinced that we will get anywhere near the Championship next year.

Stephen Hawkings Football Boots · May 13, 2009

I love the way all the long term old fans, who may not know as much as they think about modern football are happy with gunn because hes norwich through and through.

kennyfoggo · May 13, 2009

we can be assured each man will give 100% for the club.

Really. weren''t Semmy, Rusty Doherty Marshall Clingan Croft Hoolahan all our own players and what good did that do at the end of the day, I saw them throw in the towel more than once.

Rastaman · May 13, 2009

[quote user="Hucks 96"]Its good to see that the Board (what''s left on them!) have ignored those blood letting morons and appointed Bryan Gunn and his team. Congratulations Gunny I''v e been watching City for 40 years and I feel sure you are the best man for the job. I am looking forward to next season already. With your own team at least we can be assured each man will give 100% for the club.
[/quote]

You absolute Dong

Stephen Hawkings Football Boots · May 13, 2009

Peter Grant had a better record than Gunn has

Hucks 96 · May 13, 2009

Apart from Cody, Gunn didn''t sign any of the players who took us down.

AJ · May 13, 2009

[quote user="kennyfoggo"]we can be assured each man will give 100% for the club.

Really. weren''t Semmy, Rusty Doherty Marshall Clingan Croft Hoolahan all our own players and what good did that do at the end of the day, I saw them throw in the towel more than once.[/quote]Croft, Clingan, Hoolahan and Doc cannot be faulted for their efforts. It''s just a shame those around them didn''t put in the same kind of work ethic and desirability

First Wizard · May 13, 2009

[quote user="Hucks 96"]Its good to see that the Board (what''s left on them!) have ignored those blood letting morons and appointed Bryan Gunn and his team. Congratulations Gunny I''v e been watching City for 40 years and I feel sure you are the best man for the job. I am looking forward to next season already. With your own team at least we can be assured each man will give 100% for the club.
[/quote]

Enjoy relegation then.............again.

Rastaman · May 13, 2009

Gunn is a SPAK

Stephen Hawkings Football Boots · May 13, 2009

So Killan, carney, leijer and gow didnt help us down, and the persistent playing of otsemobor

kennyfoggo · May 13, 2009

[quote user="AJ"][quote user="kennyfoggo"]we can be assured each man will give 100% for the club.

Really. weren''t Semmy, Rusty Doherty Marshall Clingan Croft Hoolahan all our own players and what good did that do at the end of the day, I saw them throw in the towel more than once.[/quote]Croft, Clingan, Hoolahan and Doc cannot be faulted for their efforts. It''s just a shame those around them didn''t put in the same kind of work ethic and desirability[/quote]But still we went down, the point was nothing guarantees 100% effort whether a loan player or our own. Croft gave up the fight, his injury wasn''t of the phyiscal but of the heart, (Munby''s words not mine) I still say I saw them lose heart and fight. true they did give it some at times but at the end of the day, they weren''t good enough, that includes the lot...

ACE · May 13, 2009

Thats is a crock of sh*t.He was head of player recruitment - he influenced the players the club brought in.As manager he brought in several loans, not "nine day wonders" he had been the person scouting them for ages - and they were all, apart from Mooney and Lee (partly) absolutely shocking.

[quote user="Hucks 96"]Apart from Cody, Gunn didn''t sign any of the players who took us down. [/quote]

As my login causes problems [ :o) ] · May 13, 2009

[quote user="Hucks 96"]Its good to see that the Board (what''s left on them!) have ignored those blood letting morons and appointed Bryan Gunn and his team. Congratulations Gunny I''v e been watching City for 40 years and I feel sure you are the best man for the job. I am looking forward to next season already. With your own team at least we can be assured each man will give 100% for the club.
[/quote]

How are you Melissa, or is it Angus?

NCFC_Shaun · May 13, 2009

[quote user="Hucks 96"]Apart from Cody, Gunn didn''t sign any of the players who took us down.
[/quote]

So Gunn signed one player according to you [^o)] Loan players do count. They still contribute to the team... If they don''t, we shouldn''t be signing them. Which is something Gunn did. Therefore your argument does not stand.

wilw6 · May 13, 2009

Wake up and smell the coffee. Gunn''s already shown himself to be a failure.

Lord Horn · May 13, 2009

[quote user="Hucks 96"]Its good to see that the Board (what''s left on them!) have ignored those blood letting morons and appointed Bryan Gunn and his team. Congratulations Gunny I''v e been watching City for 40 years and I feel sure you are the best man for the job. I am looking forward to next season already. With your own team at least we can be assured each man will give 100% for the club.
[/quote]

Surely I can''t be the only one on here that thinks this is a wind up! By the way, I''ve supported the club for 45 years and I''m seriously thinking of chucking in my season ticket now - so enough of the ''ageist'' remarks in some of the posts please!!

[:@]

southstand · May 13, 2009

I would not call it an excellent decision, but a sensible one

Yes Gunn''s record over the last 19 games needed to be better,but for many reasons the team failed. I would not be critical of his team selection and in the main his tactics and substitutions. The team ( contract and loanees ) did not deliver. The main monies available were spent in advance, and he had to try to motivate what he had to deal with what was always going to be a difficult run in. I don''t think we got fairness from the referees and the argument that it evens itself out will have to wait for next year

As a City supporter , and football supporter, for the last 50 years I take exception to the ageism comments that perhaps we don''t understand modern football.

My main concern has been the number of management payoffs that have been made to Worthington, Grant and Roeder and all their hangers on ( sorry I mean coaching staff and assistants)

When you look at City''s resources we need to spend all our monies on playing staff not constantly swopping and changing the management, with huge pay packets

My general view on the managers available is that most have no proven track record and are a set of chancers.

It''s a gamble whether they can deliver without a large transfer pot - just look at the rubbish Roeder and Grant imported

We are now relegated and we do not need another set of fresh faces - the board is sorting itself out and I think there will be more changes.

Staying with Gunn is the sensible route - use whatever money is available to sign new Norwich players.

I know many fans want a root and branch clear out - but the decision has been made .Lets start getting behind Gunn and his team and help them get back into the Championship

I hope that they realise that they will have a new and perhaps novice squad that will need to be gelled together to produce results

I hope we see an early end to the summer hols, starting training early, afternoons at Colney working on freekicks, corners , organisation and tactics. Gunn can start doing one thing different - make sure that the team operates as a unit and can deliver the basics, time and time again. Crosses, frrekicks, corners and basic goal finishing. If only....

Bury Green · May 13, 2009

Needed to be better, you’re a one for understatement aren’t you? Unless I am much mistaken I walked out of the Valley last week having just watched our team hit a fifty year low, I’ll give you needed to be better.

cockers85 · May 13, 2009

everyone on posting on here except the original are berks, get over it

BlueJam · May 13, 2009

Nonsense,At a relegated Charlton, our esteemed manager motivated our players so well that we went 1-3 down. The lot of them had no idea what the score at Plymouth was at the time. Useless, spineless and a waste of time in my opinion. Sod the "blame it on the loan system" thing the board spout - we failed, Gunn failed and now he has been rewarded for that failure with a 12 month extension. What if we go down to league 2, will reward him with a 24 month contract? Frankly, this has made me want to ditch my ticket next year, just a shame I already started paying.

WiMMiT · May 13, 2009

[quote user="southstand"]I would not call it an excellent decision, but a sensible one Yes Gunn''s record over the last 19 games needed to be better,but for many reasons the team failed. I would not be critical of his team selection and in the main his tactics and substitutions. The team ( contract and loanees ) did not deliver. The main monies available were spent in advance, and he had to try to motivate what he had to deal with what was always going to be a difficult run in. I don''t think we got fairness from the referees and the argument that it evens itself out will have to wait for next year As a City supporter , and football supporter, for the last 50 years I take exception to the ageism comments that perhaps we don''t understand modern football. My main concern has been the number of management payoffs that have been made to Worthington, Grant and Roeder and all their hangers on ( sorry I mean coaching staff and assistants) When you look at City''s resources we need to spend all our monies on playing staff not constantly swopping and changing the management, with huge pay packets My general view on the managers available is that most have no proven track record and are a set of chancers. It''s a gamble whether they can deliver without a large transfer pot - just look at the rubbish Roeder and Grant imported We are now relegated and we do not need another set of fresh faces - the board is sorting itself out and I think there will be more changes. Staying with Gunn is the sensible route - use whatever money is available to sign new Norwich players. I know many fans want a root and branch clear out - but the decision has been made .Lets start getting behind Gunn and his team and help them get back into the Championship I hope that they realise that they will have a new and perhaps novice squad that will need to be gelled together to produce results I hope we see an early end to the summer hols, starting training early, afternoons at Colney working on freekicks, corners , organisation and tactics. Gunn can start doing one thing different - make sure that the team operates as a unit and can deliver the basics, time and time again. Crosses, frrekicks, corners and basic goal finishing. If only....[/quote]

Best post of the day.

Congratulations.

CANARY CHARGE · May 13, 2009

[quote user="Hucks 96"]Its good to see that the Board (what''s left on them!) have ignored those blood letting morons and appointed Bryan Gunn and his team. Congratulations Gunny I''v e been watching City for 40 years and I feel sure you are the best man for the job. I am looking forward to next season already. With your own team at least we can be assured each man will give 100% for the club. [/quote]You claerly havent seen Gunn in action as manager!!! dark clouds over carrow road!

Bury Green · May 13, 2009

[quote user="cockers85"]everyone on posting on here except the original are berks, get over it[/quote]

This one happens to have watched each and every one of Gunn’s games in charge and is delighted to announce you haven’t got a f-----g clue what you’re talking about pal

Jamie D · May 13, 2009

It was Roder that sent us down, Gunn was just trying to make the best of a bad situation, granted he may have not done the best but i think the season was over way before Gunn was our manager. (Hoolahan getting injured didnt help!)

Also i am glad that we now have a permant manager now instead of wasting more time, at least now the rebuild can begin.

Scot-e-dog · May 13, 2009

[quote user="southstand"]I would not call it an excellent decision, but a sensible one