ncfclad 0 Posted May 8, 2009 The fact that he should now know which players are a waste of space i.e. Otsemobor, Marshall etc... A new manager may take time to realise this.I will back him if he gets rid of them, but wont if they are still here come August 8th. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alex_ncfc 647 Posted May 8, 2009 There is not ONE good reason to keep Gunn, possible or not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Graham Humphrey 13 Posted May 8, 2009 [quote user="ncfclad"]The fact that he should now know which players are a waste of space i.e. Otsemobor, Marshall etc... A new manager may take time to realise this.[/quote]A new manager will want to bring his own players in anyway. I''m sure he''ll have done his homework on them.I''m sorry but I have not seen one good reason that stands up to scrutiny why Gunn should be kept on as manager. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Graham Humphrey 13 Posted May 8, 2009 [quote user="Pablos pubic perm"]He''s cheap?[/quote]...except this one of course. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Henry VIII 0 Posted May 8, 2009 [quote user="ncfclad"]The fact that he should now know which players are a waste of space i.e. Otsemobor, Marshall etc... A new manager may take time to realise this.I will back him if he gets rid of them, but wont if they are still here come August 8th.[/quote]Possible stupid idea?No, it definitely is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hairy Canary 668 Posted May 8, 2009 [quote user="ncfclad"]The fact that he should now know which players are a waste of space i.e. Otsemobor, Marshall etc... A new manager may take time to realise this.I will back him if he gets rid of them, but wont if they are still here come August 8th.[/quote]When asked to pick his player of the season Gunn put Marshall in third place so he hardly considers him a waste of space. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites