canarynotsonew77 0 Posted May 5, 2009 Went to the forum yesterday, Gunn didnt impress me at all. Whether you are receiving snidey comments or not, you dont start getting invloved in arguments with the fans, you should just rise above it. I thought Gunn lacked a lot of class yesterday. He shouldn''t be given the job, I''m stunned that he''s even being considered.Whether you like Doncaster or not, the way he handled the stick he received yesterday was by far the best way, Gunn should have taken his lead from Neil, but instead he decided to get involved with some of the fans comments. He should have only answered questions that were asked over the microphone.Added to that he can''t manage a football team to save his life. Rubbish tactics, rubbish team selection, rubbish manager. Gunn Out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DEL123 0 Posted May 5, 2009 [quote user="canaryspike7"]Went to the forum yesterday, Gunn didnt impress me at all. Whether you are receiving snidey comments or not, you dont start getting invloved in arguments with the fans, you should just rise above it. I thought Gunn lacked a lot of class yesterday. He shouldn''t be given the job, I''m stunned that he''s even being considered.Whether you like Doncaster or not, the way he handled the stick he received yesterday was by far the best way, Gunn should have taken his lead from Neil, but instead he decided to get involved with some of the fans comments. He should have only answered questions that were asked over the microphone.Added to that he can''t manage a football team to save his life. Rubbish tactics, rubbish team selection, rubbish manager. Gunn Out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![/quote]Another thread said Gunn handled it better than Doncaster...Just goes to prove how people see it so differentWith you though.............MUST GO Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shareholder-fairy 0 Posted May 5, 2009 It''s you who ain''t got a clue all the other reports say Gunn handled it the BEST! Try putting some constructive criticism together for a change other than rubbish rubbish rubbish! Have you forgotten he inherited the ''rubbish'' you describe you can''t blame him for that.He has demonstrated integrity, people and man management skills and has the respect of managers and people in the game at the highest levels, his ability to recruit Butterworth and Crook shows his acumen- Butterworth has the highest level of coaching ability and qualifications and with the creativity and excellence of Crook this combination provides an exciting new dawn for the club. He was willing to take on the trail of destruction and dessimation left by Roeder, appointed days before the transfer deadline with no money to spend...who else was queing up under these circumstances? Roeder left the players broken and whipped and it takes time to turn things around. They have shown their love and commitment to the club, the least they deserve is to be given the opportunity to put their collective expertise into practice. The fact that we were still in with, albeit a whisker of a chance, of survival right to the last match of the season shows that, given a clean slate, they have the capacity to take this club back to where it belongs. Loan players by and large haven’t worked. Given Gunn’s brief track record of pulling in McDonald, Smith, Shacks and Lee who have shown passion for City then what a prospect to have a whole team of players with the qualities Gunn has identified in them. Appointing a manager from lower leagues would be a big mistake and smacks more of the lack of ambition the board have been accused of. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hairy Canary 698 Posted May 5, 2009 [quote user="shareholder-fairy"]It''s you who ain''t got a clue all the other reports say Gunn handled it the BEST! Try putting some constructive criticism together for a change other than rubbish rubbish rubbish! Have you forgotten he inherited the ''rubbish'' you describe you can''t blame him for that.He has demonstrated integrity, people and man management skills and has the respect of managers and people in the game at the highest levels, his ability to recruit Butterworth and Crook shows his acumen- Butterworth has the highest level of coaching ability and qualifications and with the creativity and excellence of Crook this combination provides an exciting new dawn for the club. He was willing to take on the trail of destruction and dessimation left by Roeder, appointed days before the transfer deadline with no money to spend...who else was queing up under these circumstances? Roeder left the players broken and whipped and it takes time to turn things around. They have shown their love and commitment to the club, the least they deserve is to be given the opportunity to put their collective expertise into practice. The fact that we were still in with, albeit a whisker of a chance, of survival right to the last match of the season shows that, given a clean slate, they have the capacity to take this club back to where it belongs. Loan players by and large haven’t worked. Given Gunn’s brief track record of pulling in McDonald, Smith, Shacks and Lee who have shown passion for City then what a prospect to have a whole team of players with the qualities Gunn has identified in them. Appointing a manager from lower leagues would be a big mistake and smacks more of the lack of ambition the board have been accused of.[/quote]But he couldn''t even get the team up for it for our last hope at Charlton. He is not the answer at this critical time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
canarynotsonew77 0 Posted May 5, 2009 Totally disagree. You obviously dont understand how people SHOULD go about things. Doncaster was pure class yesterday and Gunn lacked it quite clearly. I dont care what players Gunn took on, he obviously was confident that he could keep us up with those players otherwise he wouldnt have taken the job. Appointing a manger from lower leagues would be better than appointing somebody who was Head of the Carvery two years ago. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xxxx 0 Posted May 5, 2009 Gunns team never showed up for vital matches a clear sign that a Oddjob man cannot manage a football club , and the way he is trying to hang onto the job is disgusting . Take a leaf out of Peter Grants book Gunn and quite frankly do one . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
canarynotsonew77 0 Posted May 5, 2009 [quote user="Dictator Smith"]Gunns team never showed up for vital matches a clear sign that a Oddjob man cannot manage a football club , and the way he is trying to hang onto the job is disgusting . Take a leaf out of Peter Grants book Gunn and quite frankly do one .[/quote]I totally 100% agree with the above. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
canarynotsonew77 0 Posted May 5, 2009 Gunn probably will get the job, but if he doesnt, can he really stay at this football club after being manager? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
norwich flag 0 Posted May 5, 2009 never showed up his job to get them up for itand in my eyes failed and the buck stops with him so people want to reward himwith keeping him on so we sink evan deeperno way hozay Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
canarynotsonew77 0 Posted May 5, 2009 Totally agree!GUNN OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TerryTibbs 0 Posted May 5, 2009 [quote user="shareholder-fairy"]It''s you who ain''t got a clue all the other reports say Gunn handled it the BEST! Try putting some constructive criticism together for a change other than rubbish rubbish rubbish! Have you forgotten he inherited the ''rubbish'' you describe you can''t blame him for that.He has demonstrated integrity, people and man management skills and has the respect of managers and people in the game at the highest levels, his ability to recruit Butterworth and Crook shows his acumen- Butterworth has the highest level of coaching ability and qualifications and with the creativity and excellence of Crook this combination provides an exciting new dawn for the club. He was willing to take on the trail of destruction and dessimation left by Roeder, appointed days before the transfer deadline with no money to spend...who else was queing up under these circumstances? Roeder left the players broken and whipped and it takes time to turn things around. They have shown their love and commitment to the club, the least they deserve is to be given the opportunity to put their collective expertise into practice. The fact that we were still in with, albeit a whisker of a chance, of survival right to the last match of the season shows that, given a clean slate, they have the capacity to take this club back to where it belongs. Loan players by and large haven’t worked. Given Gunn’s brief track record of pulling in McDonald, Smith, Shacks and Lee who have shown passion for City then what a prospect to have a whole team of players with the qualities Gunn has identified in them. Appointing a manager from lower leagues would be a big mistake and smacks more of the lack of ambition the board have been accused of.[/quote]Which member of his family are you? Seen a number of your posts... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
canarynotsonew77 0 Posted May 5, 2009 Its either the artist or the facebooker! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Smudger 0 Posted May 5, 2009 I agree that both Neil Doncaster, Roger Munby and Lee Croft handled things as well as they could yesterday.If only they could handle running a football club and crossing a football as well!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZLF 274 Posted May 5, 2009 [quote user="Smudger"]I agree that both Neil Doncaster, Roger Munby and Lee Croft [:$]handled things as well as they could yesterday.[/quote]I do think that the Dont reappoint Gunn campaign is the most crucial thing on the agenda facing the club at the moment. It was his team (signings of Mooney, killen, gow, lee, shackell and the permanent staff he chose to play were HIS choices) as were excomunicating pattison etc when we needed some midfield bottle. The team selections and tactics were gunns choices as were the lack of substitutions and tactical changes that were so patently needed.All this ''I only had 9 days in the window'' rubbish is a smokescreen to protect his own back rather than recognising he had no impact on motivating his choices of player...Even more important than changing the board imho. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yellowfuture 71 Posted May 5, 2009 Agree Hairy Canary, he took on the job knowing the challenge facing him. Unfortunately he has failled, this club must not continue with it`s policy of rewarding failure! GET HIM OUT NOW! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tangible Fixed Assets anyone? 0 Posted May 5, 2009 [quote user="canaryspike7"]Went to the forum yesterday, Gunn didnt impress me at all. Whether you are receiving snidey comments or not, you dont start getting invloved in arguments with the fans, you should just rise above it. [/quote]Wasn''t there something in the press about the Norfolk way when GR was let go...... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tangible Fixed Assets anyone? 0 Posted May 5, 2009 [quote user="shareholder-fairy"] his ability to recruit Butterworth and Crook shows his acumen- [/quote]Could you please advise me as to what Premiership clubs were employing Butterworth and Crook at the time of their recruitment by NCFC. Plc.? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tangible Fixed Assets anyone? 0 Posted May 5, 2009 [quote user="Hairy Canary"][quote user="shareholder-fairy"]It''s you who ain''t got a clue all the other reports say Gunn handled it the BEST! Try putting some constructive criticism together for a change other than rubbish rubbish rubbish! Have you forgotten he inherited the ''rubbish'' you describe you can''t blame him for that.He has demonstrated integrity, people and man management skills and has the respect of managers and people in the game at the highest levels, his ability to recruit Butterworth and Crook shows his acumen- Butterworth has the highest level of coaching ability and qualifications and with the creativity and excellence of Crook this combination provides an exciting new dawn for the club. He was willing to take on the trail of destruction and dessimation left by Roeder, appointed days before the transfer deadline with no money to spend...who else was queing up under these circumstances? Roeder left the players broken and whipped and it takes time to turn things around. They have shown their love and commitment to the club, the least they deserve is to be given the opportunity to put their collective expertise into practice. The fact that we were still in with, albeit a whisker of a chance, of survival right to the last match of the season shows that, given a clean slate, they have the capacity to take this club back to where it belongs. Loan players by and large haven’t worked. Given Gunn’s brief track record of pulling in McDonald, Smith, Shacks and Lee who have shown passion for City then what a prospect to have a whole team of players with the qualities Gunn has identified in them. Appointing a manager from lower leagues would be a big mistake and smacks more of the lack of ambition the board have been accused of.[/quote]But he couldn''t even get the team up for it for our last hope at Charlton. He is not the answer at this critical time.[/quote]Well said or for Lappinitup: BOARD OUT! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites