Stop Gunn bashing

[Simon Lappin, King Of Spain 0]

[quote user="Bigus"]

We''ll, its hard to motivate a bunch of players who have checked out. Players in the pub on Sunday night and at the station in Charlton, 30 mins after the game says it all really. Some good points but I believe Sky is reporting Gunny has the job so we should all now collectively support the man for the good of the club.

Up the City!

[/quote]

They may have checked out by the Charlton game but at Ipswich and Reading they still had the chance to keep their destiny in their own hands. Anyway what does it say about his motivational skills if he can''t get them up for the most important game the club has played in 50 years? Personally can''t blame the players for wanting to get wankered after the Charlton game, I certainly did! I can''t find anything about him being appointed at the moment. I wouldn''t trust Sky, went on their website after the Reading game and they had a picture of glenn roeder as the norwich manager!

I will be behind him 100% if he is appointed but I won''t be alone in wanting to see him make some pretty major changes to the way we are playing as well as personnel at the club and fairly swiftly at that.

[grantroederdisaster 0]

[quote user="cockers85"]

I just want to come to the defence of Gunny as I''ve noticed some people posting on here are giving him an unnecessarily hard time. Obviously he diserves some criticism given the current situation, but people questioning his status as a true Norwich legend and his commitment to the club are fickle and idiotic beyond beleif.

In this day and age it is unbelievably rare to find people working at football clubs who are truely passionate about them. This includes players, manager, board members or coaching staff, given how money driven the game is actual love for a team is given a backseat. When he retired he could have gone off done his badges and attempted a career in more appealing roles in managment and coaching e.g. Bowen, Culverhouse, Robins, Crook, Butterworth etc. Instead he stayed at the club he loves a worked in much more uninteresting roles like head of advertsing and player recruitment. Although i cant say for sure he would have been successful moving away from Norwich or that any oppotunites like that would have been offered to him, i know for a fact he stayed because of his loyalty to NCFC and that he wanted to be involved in anyway he could.

The board appointing him was obviously unsuccessful, they seemed to think it would have the ''Alan Shearer at Newcastle'' affect to galvanize the club. It didnt, it was the cheap option. Nevertheless he did what he could with a poor, uninterested, out of form squad and with little to no experience of team managment.

If you look at the satff and players he brought in it is not difficult to see what his philosophy was. Crook and Butterworth, NCFC people with good league coaching experience. Lee wanted to come to the club and always looked commited (i''ve never a seen a player so soaked in sweat as he was at the Reading game). Although Shaks was another loan, he owes alot to the club and was solid. McDonald was given his chance and always looked commited and eager to impress, whether he has the talent or not we will see next year. He also gave the young players a chance.  To me it seemed like with the limited resources he had he was briniging in the right type of people with the right attitude and for me attitude and commitment was the main thing missing in the squad. Obviously it was unsuccessful and i personally dont want him to keep the job either. The fact is the board put him there, in the deep end, mean the blame predominatly lyes with them. Gunn went about it with the right intentions and the right way, but jus lacked the managirial talent and experience to pull it off.

Jus my opinion...

[/quote]

Here here!

 

Although I''m getting sick of people keep going on about the "experience" issue with Gunn. - While its obvious Gunn made mistakes, every human being does and what was the primary reason Roedernowhere was appointed - He had experience and look what good that did!

 

End of the day Gunn was the best option at the time especially with Butterworth and Crook in tow!

 

While we could of stayed up obviously I seriously doubt whether any other manger would of done that much differently in the poisoned chalice that Gunn took over!

[Mister Chops 7]

[quote user="cockers85"]

The board appointing him was obviously unsuccessful, they seemed to think it would have the ''Alan Shearer at Newcastle'' affect to galvanize the club.

[/quote]I think we can agree that''s pretty much the effect he''s had.