James Kent 0 Posted April 30, 2009 Surely the fact that he is releasing players early and planning pre-season tricks to Scotland suggest he already has the job.Also I simply cannot believe they would have brought in Crook and Butterworth for the sake of a few months.I understand most fans would like a new man appointed, but I think that debate is pointless, because Gunn will be allowed to carry on no matter what happens on Sunday. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the duke of norfolk 0 Posted April 30, 2009 [quote user="Jim Kent"]Surely the fact that he is releasing players early and planning pre-season tricks to Scotland suggest he already has the job.Also I simply cannot believe they would have brought in Crook and Butterworth for the sake of a few months.I understand most fans would like a new man appointed, but I think that debate is pointless, because Gunn will be allowed to carry on no matter what happens on Sunday.[/quote]Well if that does happen then i fear that we really could be in for a very long stay in League one or worse. Not because Gunn is manager but because if the board appoint him then it will show that they are not serious about getting back to the Championship. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ndhscanary 0 Posted April 30, 2009 Bryan Gunn is not a manager and should just go back to being a scout or whatever he was before. Unfortunately I fear that the board will still have him as manager as he will be the usual cheap option. I see the board coming up with something along the lines of he had a good try of keeping us Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bury Yellow 2 Posted April 30, 2009 All three signed until the end of this season. I would have hopes not even are hapless board would have promised them anything.As stated before Crooky is in digs and can return quite easily back to his family in Oz.I, for one, want them all out and replaced with a coaching team combining real experience and promise. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Time to go Delia 0 Posted April 30, 2009 If Gunn is still in charge thats another season you can write off before it even starts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stephen Hawkings Football Boots 0 Posted April 30, 2009 seems they will be getting the deduction this year as long as "they come out of administration correctly"what ever that means, was confirmed by the football league on their website. Seems harsh on southampton leeds luton and alikehttp://www.stockportcounty.com/page/LatestNews/0,,10419~1644479,00.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stephen Hawkings Football Boots 0 Posted May 1, 2009 sorry ignore the post above, should be on the stockport thread Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thebigfeller 200 Posted May 1, 2009 [quote user="Loan City Fc "]If Gunn is still in charge thats another season you can write off before it even starts.[/quote]I agree. I don''t, though, regard the recent player releases and announcement of the pre-season tour as any sort of sign he''ll definitely be kept on. These things have to be done regardless - and Norwich often tour Scotland pre-season! God knows, this board has surprised me in the wrong direction time and rime again; but at this point, I have a degree of hope they won''t be so stupid as to give him the permanent gig. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheCardinal 0 Posted May 1, 2009 Really can''t figure out how releasing players etc is indicative of the managerial situation. These are issues that need to be sorted out fairly shortly - they''re not going to just go away to allow the managerial situation to be sorted. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
XXL16 0 Posted May 1, 2009 [quote user="Jim Kent"]Surely the fact that he is releasing players early and planning pre-season tricks to Scotland suggest he already has the job. Also I simply cannot believe they would have brought in Crook and Butterworth for the sake of a few months. I understand most fans would like a new man appointed, but I think that debate is pointless, because Gunn will be allowed to carry on no matter what happens on Sunday.[/quote]I will fully support Gunny be the main man if he give the chance for the youngsters next season, and did not keep wasting money to buy other team''s reserves players Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wizard 0 Posted May 1, 2009 [quote user="Loan City Fc "]If Gunn is still in charge thats another season you can write off before it even starts.[/quote]Hexactly!I predict a trip to the fourth division if Fester is kept on! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thecanaryfan 0 Posted May 1, 2009 [quote user="Jim Kent"]Surely the fact that he is releasing players early and planning pre-season tricks to Scotland suggest he already has the job. Also I simply cannot believe they would have brought in Crook and Butterworth for the sake of a few months. I understand most fans would like a new man appointed, but I think that debate is pointless, because Gunn will be allowed to carry on no matter what happens on Sunday.[/quote]Thanks Jim. I was having a really good day till I read your post!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thecanaryfan 0 Posted May 1, 2009 I in no way mean any offence by this but what the heck has happened to Bryan Gunns facial skin? Does anybody know? I swear it wasnt like that before he took the job? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reggie Strayshun 0 Posted May 1, 2009 I really,really,hope you have got this all wrong,Jim. Nothing against Gunn,but he is not a coach/manager,and NEVER will be,I''m afraid. His talents lie elsewhere. Can''t see Butterworth or Chippy making the grade either. What we need is a management setup well versed in the school of hard knocks that is Lge One,and who know their way round it. Leicester did it with Nigel Pearson,and,just for once,the board should change the habits of a lifetime,and show some ambition and go out and get the RIGHT man for the job.If they won''t,then they should stand aside and let someone who will. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites