DumbleDelia is Magic 0 Posted November 4, 2004 As a share holder I was quite looking forward to seeing what kind of figures the club had spent/received in the last year. However, Doomcaster, er sorry, Doncaster has said that the figures “include all of the costs of promotion but none of the lucrative Premier League Sky television deal”. Can anyone explain why? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pete Raven 276 Posted November 4, 2004 Because the figures cover the period from 1 June 2003 to 31 May 2004. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Robert Fleck is still GOD! 0 Posted November 4, 2004 Hi the Sky money wont show as that will be received in the next financial year.A Ltd company has a period of time to file their yearly accounts and also ask for an extension upto 18 months this is usually the case if they are expecting a big upturn/increase in finances.Im not sure when Citys actual financial year end was the actual last day but I can only presume it was in September?So next years will show the Sky money and also the increased expenses iee bonus''s adn increased salaries and also Chris Suttons 25K a week! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bananaman 0 Posted November 4, 2004 I think it''s more likely to be Hartson.Which isn''t a bad thing in my book. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DumbleDelia is Magic 0 Posted November 4, 2004 [quote]Because the figures cover the period from 1 June 2003 to 31 May 2004.[/quote]Aha! Merci Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mello Yello 2,281 Posted November 4, 2004 Norwich City I assume, are being somewhat prudent regarding their financial situation. As everyone knows, a fool and his/her "wad" are easily parted. I don''t think City have an hidden agenda concerning disclosure of their accounts, but come the January transfer debacle, they don''t want prospective selling clubs to know we have "Brewsters millions". We have to be a bit careful, as it certainly hasn''t done last seasons Premiership teams any good. This situation reminds me of a bloke who I served with in the military. He always carried two packets of fags on his personage. One packet was nearly full, and the other contained just the one. Yep! when one of the guys asked him for a ciggy, he would open the pack and say "Sorry chum, it''s my last one!" I believe he is now a successful businessman.... OTBC ;~) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gentleman Jim 0 Posted November 4, 2004 [quote]Norwich City I assume, are being somewhat prudent regarding their financial situation. As everyone knows, a fool and his/her "wad" are easily parted. I don''t think City have an hidden agenda concernin...[/quote]good analogy Mello ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StevenageFan 0 Posted November 4, 2004 great idea, I''m gonna try that packet of fag trick............hang on.......I don''t smoke Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
