James Kent 0 Posted April 17, 2009 For me the decision to bring Shackell back, might be what keeps us up. I think he and Doherty have been immense.Yes, players have scored goals, but those two have kept games tight. Also, Butterworth deserves credit for working on the defence.I really hope a way is found to bring shax back on a permanent deal. We will need a solid spine and keeping these two players together will be crucial. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
James Kent 0 Posted April 17, 2009 Sorry about the spelling in the title that should read:Doc and Shax deserve all the applause Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paul Spector 0 Posted April 17, 2009 Ah, wondered what appulse was!Agree with the sentiments of your post though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ca 1 Posted April 17, 2009 I see that **** ( who''s name I mustn''t mention) says in his interview yesterday that it was a ridiculous decision to let Shacks go, who agrees with him? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
James Kent 0 Posted April 17, 2009 Of course it was.The hope is that a deal for Shackell would be in the interest of both clubs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
city-till-i-die 7 Posted April 17, 2009 [quote user="Jim Kent"]For me the decision to bring Shackell back, might be what keeps us up. I think he and Doherty have been immense. Yes, players have scored goals, but those two have kept games tight. Also, Butterworth deserves credit for working on the defence. I really hope a way is found to bring shax back on a permanent deal. We will need a solid spine and keeping these two players together will be crucial.[/quote]hold the applause for a 3 more games...but agree they have been superb Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
missing in action? 0 Posted April 17, 2009 [quote user="cityangel"]I see that **** ( who''s name I mustn''t mention) says in his interview yesterday that it was a ridiculous decision to let Shacks go, who agrees with him?[/quote]seems like im being picky but, i think if shackell stayed he would revert to his old self, good in patches but just not great.i would dearly love to be proven wrong thoigh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
John Boubepo 0 Posted April 17, 2009 Pre-Roeder Shax was pretty good - post Roeder Shax has been very good - it''s just the bit in the middle which coincides with Roeders tenure which wasn''t so good - thinking about it, did any player play well for more than a couple of games under Roeder - Kind of shows what a totally, totally cr@p manager Roeder was! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pennywise 0 Posted April 17, 2009 could you imagine alan lee coming in and giving it all for roeder ? i think gunny should take some credit for the choice of player he`s bought in including shax and the way he`s made most of them bleed yellow and green and give their all almost instantly [:D] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
city-till-i-die 7 Posted April 17, 2009 [quote user="pennywise "]could you imagine alan lee coming in and giving it all for roeder ? i think gunny should take some credit for the choice of player he`s bought in including shax and the way he`s made most of them bleed yellow and green and give their all almost instantly [:D][/quote]spot on PW[Y] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardhouse44 261 Posted April 17, 2009 [quote user="Jim Kent"]For me the decision to bring Shackell back, might be what keeps us up. I think he and Doherty have been immense.Yes, players have scored goals, but those two have kept games tight. Also, Butterworth deserves credit for working on the defence.I really hope a way is found to bring shax back on a permanent deal. We will need a solid spine and keeping these two players together will be crucial.[/quote]Totally agree Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
