Norwich1938 0 Posted April 7, 2009 Sorry but what are the managerment doing playing unfit players, why I say that is because if you watch the warm up you could see Croft was not fit, and why was Lee not starting the game, Did we need to win????????? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
I am a Banana 0 Posted April 7, 2009 gunns decision!!yes we probs did! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paul Spector 0 Posted April 7, 2009 Because he felt it was worth the risk of playing a slightly unfit Croft.It was always going to be a gamble, and in this case it didn''t pay off. Had we won Gunn would be lauded a genius, such is the nature of management. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AJ 1,218 Posted April 7, 2009 It is rather hit and miss. But the question is - who would have played right midfield if Croft hadn''t? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Branston Pickle 3,635 Posted April 7, 2009 I don''t think he would have been lauded, though - before the game most people thought Lee (for either Carney or Croft) was the right choice and nothing happened to change that opinion. I think Gunn called wrong, but that''s life, is water under the bridge and we move on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Norwich1938 0 Posted April 8, 2009 Re the unfit Croft, play anyone rather than unfit players say Paterson and as far as Sat thats what was needed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
