YellowRoad 0 Posted April 3, 2009 Loan extended but he can''t play in maybe one of our most important game of the season which is a big shame.Only Wimbledon were fair to let their loan player David Nielsen play against them, and indeed he scored for City.That''s all in the game, they don''t want him so why is he not allowed to play against them, strange strange rule.Should be forbidden by the FA. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary_on_the Trent 0 Posted April 3, 2009 it''s standard Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YellowRoad 0 Posted April 3, 2009 But shouldn''t be ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Syteanric 1 Posted April 3, 2009 yes it should.. how do you Reading dont want Mooney.. he has simply been sent here for match practice...he is working for, and paid by Reading.. he is there player and they can do what they like with him... If Jamie cureton had played for barnsley and scored against us you''d be screaming blue murder.....ever been on a Secondment in work Yellowroad? you could say that a loan works in a very similar way.jas :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
San Miguel 0 Posted April 3, 2009 i don''t have a problem with the rule at all. i am gutted Mooney will be absent for that game, but if I was manager of Reading i would feel the samei remember Real Madrid loaning Morientes to Monaco and forgetting to put a clause in so he couldn''t play against them. they met in the Champions League semi-finals and over the two matches i think Morientes scored 3 goals and put Madrid out. cost them millions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
canarytom 0 Posted April 3, 2009 What did you expect? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Theres only one Ken Foggo 0 Posted April 3, 2009 This reminds me of a bizarre situation that occurred 20 odd years ago - Peter Withe went on loan from Sheffield United to Birmingham, and ex-Canary goalkeeper Roger Hansbury went on loan in the other direction. Shortly afterwards the Blades met Birmingham at Bramall Lane and Withe and Hansbury were allowed to play against their respective parent clubs. Lo and behold, Birmingham won 2-0 and Withe scored both their goals! Blades fans were absolutely furious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freestone85 0 Posted April 3, 2009 but what would you say if he played against them it was 0-0 and he missed a sitter in the 90th minute or scored an own goal ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Bump 0 Posted April 3, 2009 How is it a strange rule? Reading are doing a favour loaning him out to us, whether that''s to get him first team football or because they don''t want him, I don''t know. But to loan your own player out only to give him the chance to screw you over would be insane. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
city-till-i-die 7 Posted April 3, 2009 [quote user="jas the barclay king"]yes it should.. how do you Reading dont want Mooney.. he has simply been sent here for match practice...he is working for, and paid by Reading.. he is there player and they can do what they like with him... If Jamie cureton had played for barnsley and scored against us you''d be screaming blue murder.....ever been on a Secondment in work Yellowroad? you could say that a loan works in a very similar way.jas :)[/quote]VERY FUNNY...LOL. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ricardo 7,339 Posted April 3, 2009 Seems fair enough to me.We would be unhappy if we loaned out someone who played and scored against us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
When Saturday Comes 0 Posted April 3, 2009 [quote user="canarytom"]What did you expect?[/quote]Prat! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BroadstairsR 0 Posted April 3, 2009 The whole loan system should be revamped.There are far too many instances of it not being fair.Shackell, on loan from Wolves played a big part in us winning a point at Birmingham.Birmingham and Wolves are rivals for automatic promotion.Should loan arrangements between clubs in the same league be allowed when things like this can happen? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bristol_canary 0 Posted April 6, 2009 [quote user="The Undertaker"][quote user="canarytom"]What did you expect?[/quote]Prat![/quote]what did you expect?i think you should change your name back to cottaging canary Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
