sinfony 0 Posted March 22, 2009 Rule 47.3.1 A maximum of 5 loan Players (either Short Term or Long Term) can be named in the sixteen Players listed on a team sheet for any individual MatchToday:Shackell (Wolves), Bertrand (Chelsea), Gow (Rangers), Mooney (Reading), Carney (Sheff Utd) and Lee (Palace).Problem?! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HOCKEYMYHERO 0 Posted March 22, 2009 These might be stupid rules but you will find Gow is not included as he plays for a team in Scotland and does not come under the same criteria as the others and does not count in the 5 only allowed . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Camuldonum 0 Posted March 22, 2009 [quote user="sinfony"]Rule 47.3.1 A maximum of 5 loan Players (either Short Term or Long Term) can be named in the sixteen Players listed on a team sheet for any individual Match Today: Shackell (Wolves), Bertrand (Chelsea), Gow (Rangers), Mooney (Reading), Carney (Sheff Utd) and Lee (Palace). Problem?![/quote]Gow is Scottish and not a loan player. He is classed as an international player and comes on a short term contract, not a loan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aurelius 0 Posted March 22, 2009 Exactly, Gow doesn''t count: http://www.pinkun.com/content/ncfc/story.a...3A01%3A40%3A990 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Branston Pickle 3,656 Posted March 22, 2009 ....it is indeed the case that Gow doesn''t count as one of the loans, but tbh the penalty for violating this rule is so pathetic as to almost encourage it if the need arose - Sheff Wed were fined just a couple of thousand for breaking it in an important "relegation threatened vs promotion chasing" game (Stoke) last season, which surely sets a precedent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WeAreYellows49 0 Posted March 22, 2009 [quote user="sinfony"]Rule 47.3.1 A maximum of 5 loan Players (either Short Term or Long Term) can be named in the sixteen Players listed on a team sheet for any individual Match Today: Shackell (Wolves), Bertrand (Chelsea), Gow (Rangers), Mooney (Reading), Carney (Sheff Utd) and Lee (Palace). Problem?![/quote]And your point, even though it''s not correct, is? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ca 1 Posted March 22, 2009 Every time we play a game now we get visitors asking about loan players [:D] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Bump 0 Posted March 22, 2009 Echo.. echo.. echo... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
still holding out for new heroes 0 Posted March 22, 2009 I''m getting a sense of deja vu here...Perhaps we should make the loan rule a sticky to stop this thread appearing every chuffing game Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WeAreYellows49 0 Posted March 22, 2009 [quote user="still holding out for new heroes"]I''m getting a sense of deja vu here...Perhaps we should make the loan rule a sticky to stop this thread appearing every chuffing game[/quote]lol good idea Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wazzock 902 Posted March 22, 2009 Rule 47.3.2It''s Norwich.No problem. [Y] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chicken 0 Posted March 22, 2009 [quote user="Branston Pickle"]....it is indeed the case that Gow doesn''t count as one of the loans, but tbh the penalty for violating this rule is so pathetic as to almost encourage it if the need arose - Sheff Wed were fined just a couple of thousand for breaking it in an important "relegation threatened vs promotion chasing" game (Stoke) last season, which surely sets a precedent.[/quote]That is until a team that is effected by the result decides to sue . . . . . I think TevezHammer Gate will also set a precident in that if clubs infringe in a sporting law a club effected could probably have a strong case in court.If the FA really wanted to do something they should doc any points won in the said game - forget about money really because it would render doing it totally pointless. Lots of black and white and no grey. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Syteanric 1 Posted March 22, 2009 gow wouldnt of counted as he would of been a "foreign" Loanee if we had signed him on loan.Earlier this season we had 6 loans on the field when Lupoli was here.jas :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
king canary 7,604 Posted March 22, 2009 Seriously how many god dam times? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joanna Grey 0 Posted March 23, 2009 [quote user="king canary"]Seriously how many god dam times?[/quote]Totally agree. If people want to make a first post it would help if they spent some time reading the Forum first. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Matt Morriss 69 Posted March 23, 2009 Jesus im gettin sick of hearing this, heard it so many times over the weekend. Gows an international loan so doesnt count!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blahblahblah 2 Posted March 23, 2009 The last loan rule violation ended up with a £2,000 fine - I''m sure we''d live if that happened. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AJ 1,218 Posted March 23, 2009 [quote user="blahblahblah"]The last loan rule violation ended up with a £2,000 fine - I''m sure we''d live if that happened.[/quote]That''s because the side who broke the rules didn''t win - so no points we deducted. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Graham Humphrey 13 Posted March 23, 2009 They did get a draw though.Didn''t a similar thing happen to Leeds a couple of seasons back? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
king canary 7,604 Posted March 23, 2009 [quote user="Mange Tout"][quote user="king canary"]Seriously how many god dam times?[/quote]Totally agree. If people want to make a first post it would help if they spent some time reading the Forum first.[/quote]Its not just the forum, it got a front page pink un article as well! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
