better or worse after jan window deals???

[lucky green trainers 0]

not looking good is it???

[ZLF 271]

as none of the loan signings have had any impact whatsoever is anyone going to say better?

[lucky green trainers 0]

[quote user="ZippersLeftFoot"]as none of the loan signings have had any impact whatsoever is anyone going to say better?[/quote]lol zip - maybe carney is the the only one who had an impact - in the wolves match - but he''s been jetlagged ever since...

[lucky green trainers 0]

[quote user="lucky green trainers"][quote user="ZippersLeftFoot"]as none of the loan signings have had any impact whatsoever is anyone going to say better?[/quote]lol zip - maybe carney is the the only one who had an impact - in the wolves match - but he''s been jetlagged ever since...[/quote]oh - and our course - shax is back and settling in...

[mickey phelans tash 0]

We seem to be up on numbers of players but the quality needed is still missing.  Overall better but couldn''t have got much worse frankly.

[tribes 0]

or are we better or worse than when Peter Grant left?.

Marshall; Otsemobar, Shackell, Docherty,...........:Croft, Fotheringham, Cureton: With Russell and Drury all playing then along with Dublin and Huckerby.

Roeders legacy was Hoolahan, Clingan and Cort, whilst Pattison can''t get in squad.

Not a lot of improvement, is there?.

[whoareyou? 0]

Worse.

No Lita means we have no goal threat and the others don''t even seem to figure in the already poor team! the only one who does is Shackell who we already knew probably isn''t good enough!

[xxxx 0]

Worse , at least Roeder may have got somebody half decent on loan .