Yorkshire Canary 118 Posted January 30, 2009 I am pleaseed with his going provided we re invest the cash. Bell and Croft are both right wingers and in the absence of injury only one can play and for me Croft is head and shoulders the better player. Bell could cross a ball but that is about it, no pace, cannot beat a man and does not score Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rum Ol Boy 0 Posted January 30, 2009 yes but we need depth in our squad.....what the hell is the point with selling when we have a threadbare squad??? this is another bad move......so we bring in a midfielder on loan and ship out a quality contracted player.............dire Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zaytsev aka "sharpshooter" 0 Posted January 30, 2009 [quote user="Yorkshire Canary"]I am pleaseed with his going provided we re invest the cash. Bell and Croft are both right wingers and in the absence of injury only one can play and for me Croft is head and shoulders the better player. Bell could cross a ball but that is about it, no pace, cannot beat a man and does not score[/quote]For me i would take bell over croft all day long. why does every one state bell couldnt beat his man? croft hardly runs rings around anyone does he? infact he runs rings around himself. bell did beat players but not with pace, with trickery and skill, his delivery was brilliant, probally the best since crook and he created a number of goals for us probally more then croft has and all from his unprefered position! unfortunately i think bell saw the light as to where this club is heading and quickly jumped ship.Bell will be very much missed by me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The ghost of Michael Theoklitos 0 Posted January 30, 2009 I''m prepared to wait and see what the rest of the window brings, but I''m a little dubious! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Robert Ketts Yellow Army 15 Posted January 30, 2009 [quote user="Yorkshire Canary"]I am pleaseed with his going provided we re invest the cash. Bell and Croft are both right wingers and in the absence of injury only one can play and for me Croft is head and shoulders the better player. Bell could cross a ball but that is about it, no pace, cannot beat a man and does not score[/quote]But we have a very thin squad and Bell always looked to me like a good player who had potential Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trabant 0 Posted January 30, 2009 another player with so called potential, but never shows it on he pitch, i thought he was going to be quality but we have better youth players coming through Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Webbo118 0 Posted January 30, 2009 Just an observation. We have seven threads on the sale of David Bell, all basically saying the same thing. Is this necessary? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rum Ol Boy 0 Posted January 30, 2009 [quote user="Webbo118"]Just an observation. We have seven threads on the sale of David Bell, all basically saying the same thing. Is this necessary?[/quote]probably not......pm a mod to merge them Share this post Link to post Share on other sites