Duffman 0 Posted January 15, 2009 I asked for opinions on Aidy Boothroyd and this is what they said:did try and play more football this season but the players we had couldnt copenot great in the transfer market has a scatter gun approach and likes players who need a "cuddle"Mainly hoofball and although we supposedly played football this seasonwhen you see Rodgers style you see that we still practically playedHoofball still.If you have the right player hoofball can workas Aidy showed in our promotion season with players likeHenderson,KIng,Foster and to add abit of flair Ashley Young but on thewhole it hasnt done too great.Aidy is very stubborn and wontusually take advice from anyone and only likes yesmen as wheneversomeone wanted us to play passing football that worked at Watford theywould be sacked.He is also poor in the transfer market and hasmade alot of very poor signings for us but to be fair has made a fewgood ones but not enough.Apperently within football he is more hated then Warnock and Pulis.Aidy is a good manager and I believe he will be even better second timearound, if you get him, consider yourself lucky and I wouldnt betagainst you getting promoted within a couple fo seasons.Aidy will always give his best and is great when it comes to thecommunity stuff and approachability. He''ll also give younger players achance and if nothing else will give you a laugh with some of the stuffhe comes out with. And if he stumbles across the right formula you''reno doubt onto a winner.However, his signings seem to be amatter of quantity over quality and he had a reputation for notlistening to his obscenely large and expensively assembled backroomstaff. I also think that over his 3.5yrs he stuck by some players toolong and others bizarrely barely got a look in. There was no rhyme orreason to it. Tactically he was predictable by the end of his time hereand he also seemed to be about 15 mins too late making substitutionsthe fans could see were needed ages back. How much of that wasfirst job syndrome and how much was Aidy the Manager we''ll never knowuntil he''s been and gone from his second job.He''s a poor manager with lots to learn. He struck gold with one set oftactics- the hoofball, but was pretty clueless when he tried to changeit.He may learn and become a success with Norwich or elsewhere,but I''d say that it''s equally likely that he''d do a pretty poor job. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fluff 0 Posted January 15, 2009 Good judges then. Boothroyd was Worthingtons yes man when he was here, and also the reason Sammy Morgan got sacked from the academy was because he fell out with ''Ade'' and ''Ade'' walked, leaving Nigel fuming. Oh well, a return to Worthington style football looking more likely by the minute! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joanna Grey 0 Posted January 15, 2009 A lot of those comments could be said about Roeder. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jerzy Krukowski 5 Posted January 15, 2009 [quote user="Delia S. Tickers"]A lot of those comments could be said about Roeder.[/quote]Hmm, frighteningly close, except that Roeder seemed respected within the game. AB did do well for a spell with Watford but there''s precious little else to recommend him. Christ, we''ve got to get it right this time. I say Curbs or someone in as a temporary til the end of the season and see who''s available then. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0Amarillo<P><FONT color=#cccc00 size=4><EM> º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ Amarillo ¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°<EM><FONT><P>ddMMyyyy0Falseen-US<P><FONT color=#cccc00 size=4><EM> º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ Amarillo ¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°<EM><FONT><P>True 0 Posted January 15, 2009 [quote user="Delia S. Tickers"]A lot of those comments could be said about Roeder.[/quote]Plus ca change.A manager cannot listen to every opinion and act on it. Therefore, there will always be people who claim he is stubborn and doesn''t listen to advice. Just like fans want a manager who is a strong leader, but can also be influenced. Just like some fans say ''stick with the team, don''t chop and change every week'' and some say ''these players should be dropped if they''re not performing''. I guess you have to take the longer view. History suggests that a manager who gets over 40% win rate is doing well. I think Roeder was nearer 30% with Norwich, so that''s all that matters ultimately... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whoareyou? 0 Posted January 15, 2009 To be fair, you could accuse pretty much all managers of all those things at various times. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duffman 0 Posted January 15, 2009 another oneit is a total myth that he only played hoofball.in the promotion season he played direct football and not long ball, there is a big difference. thetactic was to get the ball forward as quickly as possible to thewingers which was usually on the deck, who then provided the crossesfor king and henderson to put away.when we got in the premiership, we started to move from direct to long ball and that was his downfall.if he kept with the direct play, he probably would still be in a job as we''d have been promoted last year.obviously losing young and kings knee injury which ruined him for us, where big turning points tooHide the money The last one wont be a problem, Delia is that good at hide and seek that he will never find it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites