Canary Poirot 1 Posted January 10, 2009 How on earth can Roeder keep his job? His record with us is no better than Peter Grant''s. Grant was sacked. Why is Roeder still in a job? Is it really better for the club financially to go down with Roeder as manager, than sack him and survive? God help us if it is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lincs CR 0 Posted January 10, 2009 Grant did the good thing and agreed to leave saying he wasn''t able to stop the poor results, and good on him for being honest.Glenn is arrogant, naive, and thinks he can save us yet again which will secure his job for yet another tedious relegation fought season Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lynn canary 0 Posted January 10, 2009 Grant was pathetic as manager and i am pretty sure Delia came out and said that hiring him as a manager was the wrong thing to do. Roeder is doing just as bad, if not worse than Grant. When will Delia sack him and come out once again and admit she made the wrong decison. I love Delia but she has not got any clue of what manager to sign, we need an owner who knows how good managers are and if the can bebfit the club.ROEDER OUT, BOARD OUT !!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grantroederdisaster 0 Posted January 10, 2009 Roedernowheres woeful record speaks for itself! I''ve said a long time that getting rid of Roeder ASAP will be cheaper and less disasterous than keeping him too long cause we''ll lose season ticket holders and possible relegation will cost so much more! RoederOUT! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
