King Sib

[Paul Spector 0]

Before Sibierski came we were playing some really lovely football - I really don''t see what he offers the team. Why does Glenn persist in playing him? Perhaps he would be better in a deeper position, but who know''s. From what I''ve seen though, I honestly would rather play Gary Doherty up front!

[king canary 8,733]

Its a shame I thought he would be a class signing for us but he just doesnt seem up for it!

[SnakepitCanary 0]

[quote user="We Want Worthy Back"]Before Sibierski came we were playing some really lovely football - I really don''t see what he offers the team. Why does Glenn persist in playing him? Perhaps he would be better in a deeper position, but who know''s. From what I''ve seen though, I honestly would rather play Gary Doherty up front![/quote]

God wasn''t he rubbish! Lazy, no desire, technically lacking, physically fragile. Worst player I have seen play for us in a long time. Even Chris Brown was better! 

[PhatCanary 0]

[quote user="We Want Worthy Back"]Before Sibierski came we were playing some really lovely football - I really don''t see what he offers the team. Why does Glenn persist in playing him? Perhaps he would be better in a deeper position, but who know''s. From what I''ve seen though, I honestly would rather play Gary Doherty up front![/quote]

He''s the biggest pile of shi* since Hartson was here, he''s got nothing to offer the team and spends most of the game on his backside, he was shocking tonight and is a complete waste of money! Roeder loves him and keeps playing him and i just can''t see why.

[Hughesy 0]

[quote user="PhatCanary"]

[quote user="We Want Worthy Back"]Before Sibierski came we were playing some really lovely football - I really don''t see what he offers the team. Why does Glenn persist in playing him? Perhaps he would be better in a deeper position, but who know''s. From what I''ve seen though, I honestly would rather play Gary Doherty up front![/quote]

He''s the biggest pile of shi* since Hartson was here, he''s got nothing to offer the team and spends most of the game on his backside, he was shocking tonight and is a complete waste of money! Roeder loves him and keeps playing him and i just can''t see why.

[/quote]

no-one is as bad as hartson!!!

i spose roeder is playing him because of his height and because of how much we are paying him.

[GJP 79]

[quote user="SnakepitCanary"]

Even Chris Brown was better! 

[/quote]

Definitely.

[John 0]

Can''t stand it. It''s little short of a disgrace Roeder continues playing Sibierski when he clearly contributes little or no benefit to the team in so many aspects, and it just makes it forever more frustrating when you know he''s there in place of talents that are worth so much more to the side in Lupoli and Hoolahan.I''ll have to stop now though or i will be ranting all night about this because it just bemuzes me as to how he can still earn a place in the starting 11 these days after what we have all seen froom him. Every time Sibierski is in the starting 11 i can''t help but question the real agenda behind Roeders management, cos he really should not... Must not be in the side.It''s shocking, it really, really is...

[John 0]

[quote user="Hughesy"][quote user="PhatCanary"]

[quote user="We Want Worthy Back"]Before Sibierski came we were playing some really lovely football - I really don''t see what he offers the team. Why does Glenn persist in playing him? Perhaps he would be better in a deeper position, but who know''s. From what I''ve seen though, I honestly would rather play Gary Doherty up front![/quote]

He''s the biggest pile of shi* since Hartson was here, he''s got nothing to offer the team and spends most of the game on his backside, he was shocking tonight and is a complete waste of money! Roeder loves him and keeps playing him and i just can''t see why.

[/quote]

no-one is as bad as hartson!!!

i spose roeder is playing him because of his height and because of how much we are paying him.

[/quote]I can''t even agree with that.Despite lacking the ability to run, Hartson put his body forward, and showed his passion and desire to benefit the side. He hit the woodwork and got an assist during his time here i think.Like i said, despite being very stationary, he did contribute to some degree, and at least showed ambition to do something for Norwich.Sibierski, apart from his first game against Plymouth, he has not once given his effort for Norwich, and has been little more than diabolical.I''m sure he wasn''t like this during his better days, but he''s been a horrible player for us, and the fact that it''s because of him we continue the long ball routine doesn''t make me any more happier to see him in the side week after week.

[Paul Spector 0]

Good question -

who offered us more, Hartson or Sib?

Hartson for me - as i''ve seen NOTHING from Sibierski thus far - which is a real shame as I was excited when we signed him.

[macdougalls perm 0]

[quote user="We Want Worthy Back"]Good question - who offered us more, Hartson or Sib? Hartson for me - as i''ve seen NOTHING from Sibierski thus far - which is a real shame as I was excited when we signed him.[/quote]

They are/were both overpaid s*** in my opinion. Offer nothing and Sibierski makes the players go for the hoof all the while. Rubbish, how he can start him ahead of Lupoli or Hoolahan is beyond me. [:O] 

[Mark .Y. 373]

[quote user="PhatCanary"]

[quote user="We Want Worthy Back"]Before Sibierski came we were playing some really lovely football - I really don''t see what he offers the team. Why does Glenn persist in playing him? Perhaps he would be better in a deeper position, but who know''s. From what I''ve seen though, I honestly would rather play Gary Doherty up front![/quote]

He''s the biggest pile of shi* since Hartson was here, he''s got nothing to offer the team and spends most of the game on his backside, he was shocking tonight and is a complete waste of money! Roeder loves him and keeps playing him and i just can''t see why.

[/quote]

Because otherwise he might as well just send him back to his own club and we would still be paying his wages. What sort of idiot would do that with a loan player !!!

 

Mark .Y.

 

[FilletTheFishWife . 0]

[quote user="Hughesy"][quote user="PhatCanary"]

[quote user="We Want Worthy Back"]Before Sibierski came we were playing some really lovely football - I really don''t see what he offers the team. Why does Glenn persist in playing him? Perhaps he would be better in a deeper position, but who know''s. From what I''ve seen though, I honestly would rather play Gary Doherty up front![/quote]

He''s the biggest pile of shi* since Hartson was here, he''s got nothing to offer the team and spends most of the game on his backside, he was shocking tonight and is a complete waste of money! Roeder loves him and keeps playing him and i just can''t see why.

[/quote]

no-one is as bad as hartson!!!

i spose roeder is playing him because of his height and because of how much we are paying him.

[/quote]

 

But he''s not even that good in the air! Lita is shorter but still makes more headers than Sitonmyarski.

 

And half the team were bombed out after one no-show at Plymouth last season whilst similar performances from his own recruits continually return to the team sheet.

Chris Brown was/is a better player than Sib.

Meanwhile is Lappin really worse than bertarnd has been this season?

 

 

[Matt Morriss 69]

I even think Hartson done a better job for us. He didnt score any goals and wasnt fit but at least he won a few headers and held the ball up. Sibierski cant even do that.