hook norton canary 0 Posted August 23, 2004 you decide?i personally would prefer harewood, he''s younger, quicker and when hucks was on loan at forrest the 2 of the them and johnson were awsome as a front 3, could be lethal at any level!can you imagine this as a front 3Mckenzie Harewoodwith Huckerby just behind Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Temp the Revelator 0 Posted August 23, 2004 Depends entirely on cost for me - if we can get Harewood for less than £1.5m, then Harewood. I also wouldn''t spend more than £500k on Johnasson, but I would be fine with either really. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
