Click and Smudger.........where are you ?

[......and Smith must score. 1,596]

I''m bound to get a shed-load of flak for saying this but I really miss the two old rascals ( well maybe not REALLY miss, just miss )

This board isn''t the focal point of most peoples lives but Smudger''s posts have dried up to a trickle and Cluck has just fallen off the radar completely without so much as a '' thank you and goodnight ''. I know things are looking pretty good at Carrow Road right now and the panto season is over but it all seems rather odd....

I know most posters were always urging them to disappear but now they have it all seems a bit flat.

 

[Joanna Grey 0]

Don''t miss them at all. I''m all for a reasonable debate but some FMs are too blinkered to actually offer one.

[Carlos Valderrama 0]

[quote user="......and Smith must score."]

I''m bound to get a shed-load of flak for saying this but I really miss the two old rascals ( well maybe not REALLY miss, just miss )

This board isn''t the focal point of most peoples lives but Smudger''s posts have dried up to a trickle and Cluck has just fallen off the radar completely without so much as a '' thank you and goodnight ''. I know things are looking pretty good at Carrow Road right now and the panto season is over but it all seems rather odd....

I know most posters were always urging them to disappear but now they have it all seems a bit flat.

 

[/quote]

Theres not much to bitch about so Cluck won''t be back until the wheels fall off.  Smudger is off protesting somewhere on his own...

[fonejacker 0]

Who''s Click?

[Carrow89 182]

Wouldn''t be the same ............ would they ?

[Show Me What You Gooot! 0]

Smudger told me Cluck got banned....?

[The Walking Man 13]

[quote user="NCFC - Dundee Division"]Who''s Click?[/quote]

 

Maybe a mouse?

 

 

 

[Inch High aka Inchy.. 417]

I''m sure they are both here somewhere.

[Shack Attack 0]

[quote user="paint_me_yellow"]

Smudger told me Cluck got banned....?

[/quote]

Can the mods confirm this?

I get the feeling that whoever was behind the character of Cluck is still among us. There''s something about a particular poster that makes me extremely suspicious of this. If I''m correct his latest incarnation is nowhere near as entertaining as Cluck was, who I must admit I was quite fond of.

[Syteanric 1]

any one noticed how when one goes missing the other always does....????

not that their the same person or anything....

jas :)

[Shack Attack 0]

[quote user="Shack Attack"]

[quote user="paint_me_yellow"]

Smudger told me Cluck got banned....?

[/quote]

Can the mods confirm this?

I get the feeling that whoever was behind the character of Cluck is still among us. There''s something about a particular poster that makes me extremely suspicious of this. If I''m correct his latest incarnation is nowhere near as entertaining as Cluck was, who I must admit I was quite fond of.

[/quote]

Has he been banned then?

Or if you tell me will you have to kill me [:P]

[Pete Raven 276]

[quote user="Shack Attack"]

Has he been banned then?

[/quote]

Yes.

[Rasputin was a C... 0]

[quote user="Web Team - Pete"]Yes.[/quote]Yes you''ll have to kill Shack Attack or Yes the Smudge has been banned?

[Rudolph Hucker 0]

Good, because his sole purpose in being on here was to cause aggravation - nothing else.

[Thecanaryfan 0]

lets be havin you! [H]

[YankeeCanary 0]

[quote user="Captain Slog"]Good, because his sole purpose in being on here was to cause aggravation - nothing else.[/quote]

I''d have to agree with that Rudolph. So far, I like this character much better.

[BlyBlyBabes 0]

[quote user="Web Team - Pete"]

[quote user="Shack Attack"]

Has he been banned then?

[/quote]

Yes.

[/quote]

Yes who, Pete?

Cluck or Smudger?

And why?

OTBC

 

[7rew 0]

[quote user="Rasputin was a C..."][quote user="Web Team - Pete"]Yes.[/quote]Yes you''ll have to kill Shack Attack or Yes the Smudge has been banned?[/quote]why not yes to both?

[YankeeCanary 0]

[quote user="Web Team - Pete"]

[quote user="Shack Attack"]

Has he been banned then?

[/quote]

Yes.

[/quote]

I think Pete was very clear and specific in his response.

[Web Team - Vince 0]

Cluck.Persistant aggravation, taking threads off topic.Although he deserved an award for his Neil Cluckcaster avatar.

[Syteanric 1]

[quote user="Rasputin was a C..."][quote user="Web Team - Pete"]Yes.[/quote]

Yes you''ll have to kill Shack Attack or Yes the Smudge has been banned?
[/quote]

Both id Expect....lol

and he must of done something REALLY bad to get banned from here...  reading some of the threads that have been posted over time and some peoples opinions on various topics then Cluckles must of really upset someone!

jas :)

[Buncey 1]

Click was a bit of t*** pot. Smudger at least doesn''t plainly insult people and actually has contructed some well thought-out posts recently (well before he dissapeared again).

[Rudolph Hucker 0]

Perhaps you should introduce a yellow and red card scheme.

Who is currently on a yellow or who is looking at a fifth yellow?

[ca 1]

Smudger is still around, he posted on the Norwich City Kitty thread a couple of weeks ago.

[Tumbleweed 106]

Smudger not plainly insult people? He/she/it was the worst of the lot for unpleasant vitriol and abuse on a regular basis to anyone who disagreed. Almost every attempt at proper debate got sidetracked into personal tirades and I would reckon it put a lot of people off. Good riddance to both.

[Carlos Valderrama 0]

[quote user="Web Team - Vince"]Cluck.

Persistant aggravation, taking threads off topic.

Although he deserved an award for his Neil Cluckcaster avatar.
[/quote]

Cluckcaster was funny, not as funny as the web team cluck incarnation before, followed by the didn''t want to be on the web team anyway cluck avatar.

[ricardo 8,034]

[quote user="Web Team - Vince"]Cluck.

Persistant aggravation, taking threads off topic.

Although he deserved an award for his Neil Cluckcaster avatar.
[/quote]

Seems a bit extreme to me Pete.

I thought this was a free country.

[ca 1]

[quote user="YankeeCanary"]

[quote user="Captain Slog"]Good, because his sole purpose in being on here was to cause aggravation - nothing else.[/quote]

I''d have to agree with that Rudolph. So far, I like this character much better.

[/quote]

 

Why have you changed your name yet again Rudolph, are you trying to confuse us all?

[Rudolph Hucker 0]

I like to try new things Angel, that''s all.

[YankeeCanary 0]

[quote user="cityangel"][quote user="YankeeCanary"]

[quote user="Captain Slog"]Good, because his sole purpose in being on here was to cause aggravation - nothing else.[/quote]

I''d have to agree with that Rudolph. So far, I like this character much better.

[/quote]

Why have you changed your name yet again Rudolph, are you trying to confuse us all?

[/quote]

City Angel, I do think we have to be tolerant with those amongst us that appear to have a desire for multiple personalities. I use the word "desire" because, apparently those that are unfortunately afflicted with multiple personality disorder ( now more correctly referred to as DOD or dissociative identity disorder ) are not generally aware of their "other selves". I''m sure at some point, given the nature of some of the inputs on this forum, it will be necessary to have a doctor at hand to treat some that appear to be afflicted in some manner, even if the condition is present only by desire rather than misfortune. We may well see a Doctor Pink''Un emerge for such situations. Indeed, he may well have already emerged as it related to the toxic Cluck personality of the past. Fortunately, the doctor had broad powers and was able, in that case, to administer euthanasia.