Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Baldyboy

poor substitutions

Recommended Posts

for the first time last night i felt roeders substitutions were poor. why did he not bring on hux earlier for gibbs and attack down both flanks, we were at home for gods sake, too cautious i feel and pattison should have come on for russell as he was poor also i thought last night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Erm - what game did you watch?  Pattison was shocking - so why bring him on for Russel who was not our worst player by a long way.  Huckerby came on and looked like a player about to move on - also Gibbs was playing a tight midfield role (like smith did) and HUckerby cant do it.

Also - people are simply underestimating the strentgth of that Hull side last night - it had height, strength, skill and a wealth of experience.

[quote user="baldyboy"]for the first time last night i felt roeders substitutions were poor. why did he not bring on hux earlier for gibbs and attack down both flanks, we were at home for gods sake, too cautious i feel and pattison should have come on for russell as he was poor also i thought last night.[/quote]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 why shouldnt we have outmuscled someone for a change? maybe we ought to have gone for strength experience and skill, oh we did when hux came on with 12 mins left!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...