lucky green trainers 0 Posted January 1, 2008 on radio naarrfolk - a caller mentions to adams that city are remoured to be in for davenport. interestingly, adams didn''t poo-poo it. he just said that he''d seen us linked with davo in a sunday newspaper - and that there is usually some truth in it. he did say it could be just an enquiry into davo''s availability/costs etc.does this mean davo is a plan b in case taylor goes tits up??? or we''re in for both??? or just mind games to flush out brum into the open??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YellowIce 0 Posted January 1, 2008 Would be fecking sweet if we got them both - but i foresee we get neither.A striker is just as vital though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grant Taylor 0 Posted January 2, 2008 it would be a great sighning but the questions are how much he gunna cost and how much is taylor gunna cost. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tangible Fixed Assets anyone? 0 Posted January 2, 2008 Prefer to have Taylor and a good centre forward. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HappyhammerAndy 0 Posted January 14, 2008 Yes please, we need to reduce the wage bill. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Citizen Journalist Foghorn 0 Posted January 14, 2008 [quote user="Canary Nut"]Prefer to have Taylor and a good centre forward.[/quote]I would far prefer Taylor to Davenport. Taylor may be too slow for the Premiership, but Davenport''s game is error strewn. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,526 Posted January 14, 2008 [quote user="Citizen Journalist Foghorn"][quote user="Canary Nut"] Prefer to have Taylor and a good centre forward.[/quote]I would far prefer Taylor to Davenport. Taylor may be too slow for the Premiership, but Davenport''s game is error strewn.[/quote]On the basis of what we saw from them during their loans here I totally agree CJF. Taylor over Davenport every time for me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Saint Canary 0 Posted January 14, 2008 [quote user="nutty nigel"][quote user="Citizen Journalist Foghorn"][quote user="Canary Nut"] Prefer to have Taylor and a good centre forward.[/quote]I would far prefer Taylor to Davenport. Taylor may be too slow for the Premiership, but Davenport''s game is error strewn.[/quote]On the basis of what we saw from them during their loans here I totally agree CJF. Taylor over Davenport every time for me. [/quote]Me too. Davenport looked no better than Shackell when he was here.It seems that Davenport is just such an easy rumour for people to start because we have been loaned him once. We have been buying/loaning for about 6 transfer windows now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buncey 1 Posted January 14, 2008 [quote user="Saint Canary"][quote user="nutty nigel"][quote user="Citizen Journalist Foghorn"][quote user="Canary Nut"] Prefer to have Taylor and a good centre forward.[/quote]I would far prefer Taylor to Davenport. Taylor may be too slow for the Premiership, but Davenport''s game is error strewn.[/quote]On the basis of what we saw from them during their loans here I totally agree CJF. Taylor over Davenport every time for me. [/quote]Me too. Davenport looked no better than Shackell when he was here.It seems that Davenport is just such an easy rumour for people to start because we have been loaned him once. We have been buying/loaning for about 6 transfer windows now.[/quote]Me three. Taylor maybe slower but he dealt with pace very well. Davenports marking and positioning were very suspect. I though west ham payed well over the odds for him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
